|
<br />FY 99 Draft Work Plan Summary (With Pgm. Dir. & technical committee comments and Pgm. Dir. responses) 07123/ga
<br /> SEC.7 Ffsa COMMENTS (PO, TECH, COMM., PO RESf'ONSE)
<br />.'- nTlE COMMITTEE TOTAL ANN. FUND CAP. FUND FUNDS FUNDS IN-KINOfOTHER
<br /> PO: Funding for PIP ($1K! shown In l&E section (VI). Recommend covering the eosts that exce&d $:399,000
<br /> - with additional FY 98 capital funds carry-over (beyond the FY 98 cany~ver In CAp.9, which Is already
<br /> accounted for In the $581,000 WW. WAC: Redamation expressed reserve about the budgetforTask 6 and
<br /> about the FY 98 cany-overs. SO needs to be refined (espllclally the budget). Report deadlines seem to be
<br /> OR YampaOperationPlan BCIWAC $:393,000 $:399,000 slipping.
<br />II. Habitat Restoration $4,16$,:300 $146,:300 $4,020,000 " $. ..
<br />CAP..., 0 ReQlands Flsh Passage Be $71,000 . $71,000 po: Deleted task 4, habitat eval.... as recommenCe-(! 1n SOW. Correct page numbers (it has two page 2's).
<br />CAp-17b 0 GVIC Fish Passage Evaluation Be $56,100 $S6,100
<br />CAPoS 0 Price-5fubbFishPassage Be $675,000 $$15,00<.\
<br />CAP-5b NEW Price-Stubb Passage Evaluation Be " " po: No sow. Won't need evaluation In FY 99 beeaus.e pass:ige won't be completed by then.
<br />CAp.1S OR Tusl:ler Wutl. OW, structure Studies Be $79,000 $79,000 ~~~~~n:=r:.utc:ome oftha FY 9S evah.latlon, tultds e,)uld be used to evaluate fish passage 01'
<br /> PO: SOW not Included in package. This was to b:'Wn pre.constructlon activities In FY 99 (dependent on
<br />CAP.15b results ofTushel"evaluatlon studies); however, In ght of budgeteornrtraInm,we recommend deferrtng this
<br />NEW Tushereonstruction Be s. one year.
<br />eAN3 0 Grand Yaney Project Fist\ Pass~e Be _.000 $420,000 PO: Most recent cost estimate Is $420K.
<br />CAP. NEW HartfandFlshPassagtl Be $50,000 $5lJ,QQQ .
<br />"'CAP" PO: Anticipated that NlWQP Will cost s!\are the remalning $::,\5K (to be conflnned ~8) BC: Pat Nelson
<br />OR Selenium effects on razorbacks Be 143,400 $43,400 reportgd that NlWQp has agreecl to fund $35K.
<br /> PO: Some disagreement on best~ to determine differt.nce in sensitivity to contaminants amon~
<br /> native fishes. Anticipated that NlWQP will cost share remaining the $:30K (to be cOl"lflmted 6/23198) B : This
<br /> SOW will be slgnifle3ntly revised. Pat Nelson l"elnrted that NIWQp is still conslderin31 cost-sharin~ this
<br /> study. The I'iIInje of seleniUm concentrations \'ri I benpanded In this study. PO RE: P: NIWQP wi I pay
<br />NEW NEW Selenium effects on RBS vs. other $31,9QO $31,900 $30.4K 1n FY 9 . Recovery Program agrees to contri!:lute $1fi.3K In FY 2000 for-analyses and report writing.
<br />natives Be
<br />NEW NEW =mental RBS spawning In Be ,. $0 po: No sow recet'l'edj PO's oftlee rneommends putt:'ng thlS'ptoposal on hold.
<br />etllumenv.
<br />7. NEW f\oodplalnProteetlon Be " $. po: No funding A!quested at this time. (:30K earfY-<M!r stilt ll'Rllable)
<br />CAP~ OR ~~ii~~rtoration Program Be
<br /> OR Contaminants site sereenlng Be $83,400 $S3,400
<br /> OR Environmental compliance Be $50,000 $5lJ,OOO po: Part of the ful\ding Identified. in this SOW ($5,600) Is shown under PIP-8 ilt the l&E section (VI).
<br /> OR Hydrology~orphOlogy Be $150,000 $150,000 . .
<br /> ~o _0' po: Part of the futlding Identified In ttlis SOW ($11,100) Is shown under plP..s in the I&E section (VI). BC:
<br /> Tom Pitts recommended asking NFWF to hel~ us get short-t~nn staff to ~ land acqu'isition. >The
<br /> PO's office. will check.lntO this and report at e next Be nWitlng. PO RESP: PO's office Is wmXing with
<br /> OR Land acquisition Be $1,947,800 $1,947,800 VfAPA forasslstance.
<br /> po: 180 whether Old C!\artey wiU be used fo(larvai RBS habltat. nonnative fish control, growout, or some
<br /> combination. SOW has been written up Wfth different options.. BC: The Committee agreed to the following
<br /> operational scenario: ffifs a lowwater year and OCW IS not~ed 'With endangere.d. fish forgrowout,
<br /> operate atttle discre1:lon of the Ouray Refuge Malt~er (with a recommendation from Program that it be
<br /> OR Old Charley nonnative fish removal Be $6,900 $8,900 drained in July). If It's a high Wateryear, wait and rain late (oetober). _
<br /> OR WalterWalker selenIum remediation Be $51,100 $51,100
<br /> OR Gravel Pit natlvefnonnatille fish $40,000 "',000 PO: Annual funds forFY 99. BC recommended continued funding 'NittI capital PO RESP: PO conCUt1l.
<br /> ewJ-" Be
<br /> OR Green Rfverlevee removal.ella.lu~ Be $365,300 $365,300
<br />Page 2
<br /> -
<br />
|