|
<br />FY 99 Recommended Work Plan Summary (With BioI. Committee comments)
<br />
<br />07/08/98
<br />
<br /> ANN. FUND SEC. 7 FY88 IN-KlNDIOTHER TECHNICAL COMMITTEE COMMENTS PO'S OFFICE COMMENTS
<br />NUMBER STATUS T111.E COMMITTEE TOTAL CM'. FUNO F\JNDS FUNDS
<br /> was needed; still need to do follow-up sgrlng
<br /> Green R. YOY CSF pop. & surv. sample not funded In FY 98, but that an the report
<br />22, OR Be $24,000 $24,000 See contingency lisl writing are the only portions of this project that are
<br />estimates needed.
<br />22f OR Yampa, lower Green, & lower Colo. Be $76,800 $76,800 00 only one reach.
<br />CSF larval abundance
<br />50 0 Eval.Ofrazorbacksuckerstocking Be $47,000 $47,GOO Update SOW \0 indude a column showing actual
<br /> numbers offish stocked.
<br /> PO'S office error. No ~m:-iver avallai~~e~~'!Ywas Recommend carrylng.over FY 98 funding ($21,000)
<br />" 0 D/str. of hatchery-reared RBS Be .. .. cvtbackto$10KinFY9a. SeeC>:lntin en bsl and conducting the work in fY 99-00.
<br />NEW NEW SurvlvalofearlyCSFlifestages Be .. ~~rISMW~~UP II1reglateasappropna~WIUl Defer one year and revise SOW.
<br /> For razorback suckers, we'll probably have to defer this No SOW received.
<br />NEW NEW Survfval of early RBS life stages Be .. tvoe of work until we flave more fish to WOfl( with.
<br /> Committee supports enflsting outside help in refining
<br /> population estimate portion of ISMP.1his year; defer
<br /> moregenetoll review for now. Tom Pitts agreed lothis
<br /> a=ch asJong as we commit to clarifying the
<br /> $10,000 o' . esoflSMP. Tom Czapla wiD workWlth Ron
<br />NEW NEW Assessment of ISMP Be $10,000 BYelto revise scope ofwor1<.
<br /> and include a hydrol~ical component (UT,,:,!~.WOrk unde::;h~lz~ the COntributlon"oftributaries to
<br />NEW NEW Contribution of tributaries to recovery $7,500 with PO's office to reVIse). See contingency Ust for $an =~=;,-::~ final report needs to be
<br />Be $7,500 Rafael asseSSmellt portion.
<br /> year,soonlyapprovedlhiSforoneyeartocomplete Anticipate future year maintenance wlH cost only
<br />NEW NEW $10,900 I ~~ won;.~ ~~er u~;es are needed, they'll be about-SK.
<br />Maintain IMO model Be $10,900
<br />NEW UNSOL Interactivecatostomid larvae key Be $a 50 . ~t~r;d~~~. may be able to help LFl find other sources NotahighpriorltyforFY99.
<br />VI.lnfonTlation, Education & Public Involvement $133,700 $25,200 $108,5O(l $a .. $a
<br />PIP.1 OR Colorado Instream flow protection PIP IE $a 50 Colorado will provide $12,500 In-kind funding.
<br />PIP-12 OR Duchesne PIP IE '0 $a Budget and SOW combined into PIP.12.
<br /> SOW seems rrimarilY targeted at late FY 98 .
<br />PIP-12113 OR ~~u~~~bb"u~h:~:f involvement IE $200 $200 ~:~es, wi! other public involvement take place in
<br />12 OR General Information and Education IE $25,000 $25,000 1KislorUDWR.
<br /> I ~::~~~~Clh~i' ~:nw,:~h~~~ ~R~~n~S a
<br /> regardinga~roPriatnessOflnterpretfvematerials
<br /> in this wildll area. Probably onlfu one sign Is
<br />NEW UNSOL Interpretive signs at Horsethief SWA IE $a ~::3j.k~:fs o:~:~~~~te~ ~~d~FJ98
<br />PIP.J OR Yampa Management Plan PIP IE $1,000 $1,000
<br /> Need to include public involvement on Grand Valley
<br />PIP.. OR GrandVaney capltallmprovements PIP IE $30,000 $30,000 Water Management
<br />PIP-S OR Coorc!. Resv. Operations PIP IE $4,200 $4,200
<br /> (m'~~:O:~98 ~=).n On till; and Coord. ~~.
<br /> operations, the PIP's need to Identify sr=c
<br /> actions (e.g., # of pUblic meetings, etc. Instead of#
<br />PIP,", $10,000 Qf hour<.. Delete parenthetical and quotation marlts
<br />OR Ruedl Reservoir PIP IE $10,000 under Due Dates.
<br />PIP.7 OR Flaming Gorge operations PIP IE $28,000 $28,000 ~~~~~~~dO~O~e:,~'~~~~.
<br />
<br />Page 5
<br />
|