Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />FY 99 Recommended Work Plan Summary (With BioI. Committee comments) <br /> <br />07/08/98 <br /> <br /> SEC. 7 FY88 <br />NUMBER STATUS TITLE COMMITTEE TOTAL ANN. FUND CAP. FUND FUNDS FUNDS IN-KlNDfOTHER TECHNiCAl COMMITTEE COMMENTS PO'S OFFIce COMMENTS <br />CAP-17b 0 Gyre Fish Passage Evaluation BC $56,100 $56,100 . <br />CAN 0 Prlce-stubb Fish Passage BC $675,000 $675,000 <br />CAP-5b NEW Price-$tubb Passage Evaluation. BC $0 $0 I ~~~;'V:~~~~~m~1::~ati~nth~~ 99 because <br />CAP-iS OR TusherWash Div. Structure Studies BC $79,000 $79,000 funds ~u d be used to evaluate fish passage Of <br /> pre-constructlon activftie~i:t. Fv 99 ~dependi;iiron <br /> results of lusher evaluation studies; however, in <br />CAP-15b NEW Tusherconstruction BC $0 ~~::n~U&Tseto:nv~~nts, we recommend <br />CAP-23 0 Grand Valley Project Fish Passage BC $420,000 $420,000 Most recent cost estimate Is $420K. <br />CAp. NEW Hartland Fish Passage BC $50,000 $50,000 <br /> $43,400 ........ ;~~elson reported that NIWQP has agreed to fund Anticipated that NlWQP will cost share the <br />951CAPfiS OR Selenium effects on razorbacks BC remaining $35K (to be confirmed 6/23/98) <br /> This SOWwilf be sign1ficanlly reviSecl. Pat Nelson Some cllsa9reementon best method to detennine <br /> reported that NfWQP is still consic!ering cost-shari~ difference In sensitivity to contaminants among <br /> Selenium effects on RBS vs. other thiS study. The range ol~~~lenium concentrations wi I native fishes. Anticipated that NfWQP will cost <br />NEW NEW natives BC $31,900 $31,900 be expanded In this stud . share remainIng the $30K (to be confinned 6f23/9S) <br /> Experimental RBS spawning In $0 '0 No SOW received; PO's office recommends putting <br />NEW NEW seleniumenv. BC this proposal on hold. <br />75 NEW Aoodplaln ProtectiQn BC $0 $0 ~3rI~:ll~~r~uested at this time. (30K carry-over <br />CAP" OR ~~I3~~~~to~tionprog~m BC . <br /> OR Contaminantssib;lscreening BC $83,400 $83,400 <br /> $50,000 $50,000 Partofthe fundf".1ldentifieclln this SOW ($5,600) is <br /> OR Environmental compliance BC shown under PIP in the I&E section (VI). <br /> OR Hydrologyfgeomorptwlogy BC $150,000 $150,000 <br /> short-term staff to accelerate land acquisition. > The Part of the fundinflldentlfied in this SOW ($11,100) <br /> OR Land acquisition BC $1,947,SOO $1,947,800 1~~.S~~.willcheckinlothisanclreportatthenexl Is shown under P p~ in the l&E section (VI). <br /> scenario: lfit's~~~wateryearand6cWisnot TBD whether Old Charley wlll be used for larval <br /> stocked with endangered fish for growoul, opecateat <br /> the discretion of the Ouray Refuge Manager {with a RBS habitat or nonnative fish control orgrowout or <br /> recommendation from Program that it be drained in some combination thereof. SOW has been written <br /> J~~~:s a high wateryear, wait and drain fate upwlthdlfferentoptlons. <br /> OR Old Charfey nonnative fish removal BC 'MOO $8,900 <br /> OR Walter Walker selenium remediation BC $51,100 $51,100 <br /> OR Gravel Pit native/nonnative fish BC $40,000 $40,000 BOR agreed this could be funded Under capital funds. Annual funds for FY 99. <br /> 4Ivaluatlon <br /> OR Green River levee removal evaluation BC $365,300 $365,300 <br /> review comments. BC would fike to see ~ Needs peer revIeW. <br /> NEW Effects of FBR on white-top distr. BC $22,700 $22,700 =:~:a~1he revised saw before giving their <br /> review comments. BC wouk:llike 10 see ~ Needs revision and peer review. <br /> NEW Role of levee removal on mosquitoes BC $20,700 $20,700 :=~~~~~~~~~~7fu~~. <br /> OR Floodplain public Involvemerrt plan IE Budget forthls Is shown In the I&E section (VI.). <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />