|
<br />FY 99 Draft Work Plan Summary (W"1th Pgm. Dir. & technical committee comments and Pgm. Dir. responses)
<br />
<br />07/23198
<br />
<br />I NUMBER I STATUS SEC. 7 FY88
<br />TiTle COMMITTEE TOTAL ANN. FUND CAP. FUND FUNDS FUNOS IN-KlND/OTHER COMMENTS (PO, TECH. COMM., PO RESPONSE)
<br />- IE $10,000 $10,000
<br /> $1,412,500 $1,168,500 $234,000 " " $10,000
<br />1 0 Utah Program Management Me $71,100 $71,10<1
<br />2 0 Reclamation Program Management Me $150,000 $150,000
<br />3 0 Service Program Mana.gement Me $722,400 $n2,4OQ po: Due to late fY 98 hires, 20K carry-overshould be available,
<br />. 0 Colorado Program Management Me $120,000 $110,000 $10,000 po: No sow received fO"l" 4b, COOW Program management Budget for 4b should not exceed $92.6K
<br />. 0 Wyoming Program Management Me $12,600 $12,600
<br /> 0 Capital Projects Coordination '234,000 $234,000 PO: Reduced budiet by ~~,I;<; Program Director's office doesn't believe the amount of FY 99 capital
<br /> Me construction reqUires a $315K increase In Program management dollars over FY 98.
<br /> 0 Admin. overhead on ANNUAl. funds $1.02,400 PO: EsUmate (Increased based on FY 98 data).
<br /> transferred from BR to FWS Me $102,400
<br />TOTAl. $12,127,700 $3,2211,500 $7,666,300 $81,500 $0 $1,159,400
<br />AVAIlABLE $3,219,200 $7,628,000
<br />DifFERENCE (Negative numbers In parentheses) ($1,300) ($38,300)
<br /> I I
<br />CONTINGENCY PROJECTS
<br />ANNUAl FUNDS:
<br /> Be PO RESP: PO priority #2
<br /> i e~~~nd~forO&M ofnewGrand ~"nm."'"
<br />29a OR 7 funding
<br /> Be PO RESP: PO priority #S
<br /> OR =~~r:~~~:;~~=~r 6 ~~~ended
<br /> Be PO RESP: PO priority #3
<br /> Yam!;la,.IOV<<!f Green, &. l<w<<!.r CcIo. recommended
<br />"" OR CSF larval abundance 6 funding
<br /> PO RESP: PO prlo~ #4. PO thinks this Is higher priority than additional $30K for monltOrln~ked
<br /> bonytan at the new reen R. site in FY 99 (proJeet #25, 2nd on BC priority list). Recommend in
<br /> Green R. YOY CSF pop. & SUI'V. monitoring 2nd site in FY 00 (~rlng stoeked fish a year later is more meaningful than re-apturing
<br /> OR estimates ~._.... 5 $39,400 them Immed"l3tely after stocking).
<br />NEW NEW San Rafael River assessment . $62,500 PO RESP: PO priority #8
<br /> NEW Eval, C$F stocklngltranslocatlon: $33_ ~~~~~~~s:;'cti~~=~:=~n~8I:JfN~e-g~~::~~UltscaptureddUring
<br /> Pallsade-R1fIe 3
<br /> Gila hybridization 2 $16,000 PO RESP: PO priority #7
<br />90 0 Oisfr'. of hatchery-reared ReS 1 $21,000 PO RESP: PO priority #6
<br />
<br />Page 6
<br />
|