|
<br />FY 99 Draft Work Plan Summary (VVrth Pgm. Oir. & technical committee comments and Pgm. Dir. responses)
<br />
<br />07123198
<br />
<br /> SEC.7 FY"
<br />NUMBER STATUS TITL.E COMMITTEE TOTAL ANN. FUNO CAP. FUND FUNDS FUNDS IN-KlNOfOTHER COMMENTS (PO, TECH. COMM., PO RESPONSE)
<br />CIoP.7 OR Expansion of Facllitfes BC
<br /> OR Grand Valley Endangered Fish Facility BC $100,000 $100,000
<br /> OR Ouny Na1Ional Fish Hatchery BC $50,000 $50,000
<br /> OR 5:-\l.~~ and readers for augmentatIon BC $90,000 $90,000 BC: This isaJl PIT tags for$90K
<br /> BC: .B~ q~estioned need for.$75K. forthe aqua.rium building when Utah said they did not need space for tile
<br /> OR Wahweap State Hatchery BC $150,000 $150,000 iZ~~:~~gr~~{~~f~~~I~s;f~~~~~~~~ia~n~ need \0 maKe sure we've agreed to use
<br />NEW UNSOL Develop larval CSF diet BC $1.6,100 $16,700 ~~~de:o~~:r~u=~~~n~s:seg~Y:;e~t~;~~a~~;=~/~~~~fsreaUctiOn, then that
<br /> BC: BC recommendS this tie a Z-Yeat" SOW: vrn.h 110 $, ill FY 99, and $1ZK (Plus avemead) In FY 2000. FY 99 task
<br /> should I?e fotfacilil.(es ~nagers Il? .<!evelop Opef"ations m:anuals ''3ase<l.on an outIfne to be developed by Tom
<br />NEW NEW Hatcheryfacilitiestevlew BC $0 f~~~:~~na:~u~=~=di~~ew~~~'::~Iogy~). In the FY2000 SrJW,
<br />~:OL Eval. CSF stockingltranslocation: PO: Recommend defening tflls study by one year ortransl<<atlng pit..tagged adults at no cost (during lSMP
<br />Pallsade-Rlfte BC $0 or other activities). Be: See contingency list.
<br /> PO: SOW was received after the PO's office developed draft ;-eC'ommended work plan. Be may still want to
<br />Collect ReS I;!.rvae for future discuss whether this ls a higher pri~ than othe.r acti'lroes. BC: Committee ~reed to defer until they
<br />broodsto(:k BC $0 evaluate howto solve the problem 0.' limited razorback broojstoek (on next B meeting agenda}.
<br />V. Research, Monitoring & Data Management $772,000 $m,OOO $0 " $0 $0
<br /><s OR Larval Ash Lab Identification BC $50,000 $50,000 PO: PO's office recommends spreading back40gged WO\1(,0'4erseveral years.
<br />16 OR Database Management BC $34,500 $34,500 PO: Seems to have overlap with 22a. BC: 5K resto~ to this project and 2201 rectuced. by $5K.
<br />22 OR lSMP {733.7K totaij BC .
<br />223 OR FWS, Adult C:SF monitoring BC $26,000 $26,000 Be: >Frank wm revise SOWto eliminate overlap with 16.
<br />2232 OR CSF population monitoring BC $44,000 $44,000
<br />22a3 OR HBC Popu{atlon estimate in Black BC $20,000 $20,000
<br />.~"
<br /> Be; If FY 98 results show that a population estimate isn't feasibOS,lfien the FY 99 work should be modified to be a
<br /> monitoring effort (wiltl only one IiiPMand a% eJdra funds re-programmed). PI's t'lee4 to start WQI\I.I~ Wi1h the
<br />2234 OR y~~~!~I:~on estimate_In the 8C $21,000 $21.000 sta!islicianonttwi~~ucnllC1\V. o<l~~toshowthatevaluation~I~~onefirst. Committee agreed to
<br /> reduce this to monitOri . Cut 21 K there be a little mom lh."!"l can be .
<br />22. OR y~~~~ \SMP on Colorado, White & BC $31,300 $31,300
<br />22c OR UOWR, Salt lake C1ty BC $161,000 $161,000 PO: Delay task #2 for anotherye~.
<br />~~ Razomaek Basinwide Monitoring Be $208,000 $2D8,OOO
<br /> PO: pO's office believes only one additional yearofdata was needed; stIl1l1eed to do follow-up spring
<br />Green R. YOY CSF pop. &surv. BC $24,000 $24,000 ~::~n:-c~~~~andthereportwriting<iJ"etheonlyportlonsOfthisproject~a.<<!
<br />.....-.
<br />22f OR Yampa, lower Green, & lower Colo. BC $76,800 $16,800 PO: 00 only one reach,
<br />CSFlarval atNlndance
<br />Iso 10 EvalofrazorUaekSUCkerstocldng BC $41,000 $47,000 Be: Update sow to Include a column showing actual numbers of tish stocked.
<br />
<br />Page 4
<br />
|