My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02848
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02848
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:47:14 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:24:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.105.I
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Navajo-Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/17/2001
Title
Navajo Dam EIS-Summer Low Flow Test Report-San Juan Water Commission Comments
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.' <br /> <br />DEC-17-2001 11: 47 <br /> <br />P.03 <br /> <br />9. P.lS, Fishing: The liu:t that outfittets had elcd or not booked trips during the week of the <br />test, as a result of!!l.mI com:ems, does not app to be a valid means of addressing impacts of <br />the low flow test or any long term. change. Th outfitters, nol lheir clients, made these decisions. <br />Table 2, which compares angler hours, does n provide:my way to actually compare the angler <br />hours during the low flow test with the 0 data presented in the table. and is therefore <br />Ill....ni"gless, if not misleading. <br /> <br />1 O. Hpdroptnl'U, polO: The discussion only ferences the crosion of the l"ouIi"g edge of the <br />turbine blades. It does not indicate poten' long term impacts of power rcdw:tion on <br />FarmingtoIL In the discussion of impacts on ther resources, long term impacts are discussed. <br />Those impacts should be discussed in this secti n as welL <br /> <br />11. P.21, Other raourr:n1tlMt1S of interesr. <br />assets (IT As) should be discussed in this repo <br /> <br />impacts or potential impacts in Indian Trust <br /> <br />and in the draft ElS. <br /> <br />12. P.ll, Wht1I the raults IIWIIII: The I" p h indicates that this discussion includes "an <br />infonnal snmmAry of test findings and 10 t 'ections for affected re urces." However, <br />the long term projections are not discussed 10 hydropower. The discussion is limited to "slight <br />damage to turbinc blades" and 'iUrthcr damag would be cxpected if flows below 350 cfs." No <br />mention is made of the long term impact ofre uced hydropower generation and lost revenues by <br />the City of Farmington. This should be incl ed in the discussion and rerereuccd in this table. <br />As mentioned above, there should be a discu ion of Tndian trust assets. Regarding ITAs, thc <br />table simply says "outside the scope of the les .. whil:h is not accurate. <br /> <br />13. P.24, TIu! tWd sup: The dates in this sect n should be revised bascd on the latest projection <br />of actual completion dates fur various items re ated to the draft and final EIS. <br /> <br />008:18 <br />TOTAL P. 03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.