Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~. <br />\ <br />i <br /> <br />j <br />l <br />I <br /> <br />.; <br />I <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />.." r':'C" ~ <br />,.....; <br /> <br />, <br />. <br /> <br />OPERATION A:-:D M.AINTENANCE <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />Agricultl.l-ral lI~((ter investigal:ions <br />Field and greenhouse studies concerning the effects of treated <br />and untreated Colorado River water on the growth of agricultural <br />and ornamental plants have been continued_ The tolerance of camel- <br />lia. hyacinth. and tuli)l'to soil salinity was investigated using sand <br />culture techniques_ The camellia test work is not completed, but <br />the hyacinth and tulip showed a marked tolerance to saline con- <br />ditions. <br />In the irrigation experiment conducted in cooperation with the <br />University of California on a 13.5-acre section of the District orange <br />groves at La Verne. the trees have been irrigated since 1942 with <br />natural and softened Colorado River water and local well water. <br />Yields have been good for all three sections of the grove_ During the <br />past season a slIlall difference was observed for the crop of Wash- <br />ington navel oranges irrigated with softened Colorado River water, <br />but no difference was noted for the Valencia orange yield_ <br />With the introduction of Colorado River water into San Diego <br />County, numerous inquiries arose regarding the probable effects <br />of the natural water on agricultural and ornamental plants in that <br />area_ The accumulated experience gained from District investiga- <br />tions and field observations over a period of six years enabled the <br />staff to answer these questions with assurance. The educational pro- <br />gram to assist both commercial and amateur growers with horticul- <br />tural problems was continued by lectures in San Diego County and <br />personal interviews in other District areas_ Some 250 soil and leaf <br />samples were collected and analyzed in order to interpret the results <br />of experiments. <br /> <br />QuaWy of Cohn'ado Rivl'r 1Voter <br />An average analysis of Colorado River water as received at and <br />delivered from the softening and filtration plant during the fiscal <br />year 1947-48 is given in table 6_ The quality of natural water by <br />months is gi,'en in table 7 and the quality of the softened water by <br />months in table 8. Due to the increased hardness of the softened <br />water released du,'ing the periods of peak flow through the soften- <br />ing plant. the average hardness of the finished water for the year <br />was 138 parts per million. which is slightly higher than the desired <br />125 parts per million. In table 9 are given data on the operation of <br />the zeolite softeners. The further decrease in the quantity of salt <br />required pel' part of hardness removed is the result of the use in <br />softener operation of a greater proportion of the beds containing <br />new zeoli te. <br />