Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"'.)" <br />:~-"".. <br />.-;y.:;.. <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />m <br />C\l <br />r-.. <br /> <br />CHAPTER I <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />f.':; <br /> <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />A monitoring plan for Stage One was developed by the Bureau in October <br />1980 as a guide for the acquisition and analysis of data to determine the <br />effects of Stage One construction on the salinity of the Colorado River. <br />Measurements and samples taken bi-monthly from observation wells provide base <br />data for evaluating the effects of the unit on ground-water flows and quality. <br />Seven of these wells have continuous water-level recorders. In addition to <br />ground-water monitoring, the program includes weekly measurements of water <br />quantity and quality in tributary drains. Samples are also taken from canals <br />where they enter and leave the Stage One area. <br /> <br />The results from the water quality monitoring will be used by the Sec- <br />retary of the Interior to assess the effectiveness of the Stage One devel- <br />opment in reducing salt loading to the Colorado River. The Secretary's <br />findings will form the basis for reconunendations to the Congress concerning <br />further construction on the Grand Valley Unit. <br /> <br />Wildlife resources are also being monitored in the Stage One area to <br />determine the project I s effect on wildlife habitat, recreational use of wild- <br />life, and wildlife populations. Studies were initiated in 1981 under con- <br />tract with the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Annual reports will be <br />prepared with completion of the final report scheduled in September, 1984. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />If salinity increases in the Colorado River are not controlled, expen] <br />sive associated problems will continue to occur and opposition to develop- <br />ment of compact-apportioned water by the Upper Basin States could occur. <br />The Colorado River, at its headwaters in the mountains of north-central <br />Colorado, has a salinity of only about 50 mg/L which progressively increases <br />downstream as a result of water diversions and salt contributions from a <br />variety of sources. In 1979 the salinity averaged about 809 mg/L at <br />Imperial Dam, the last major diversion point in the United States. Without <br />control measures the concentration at Imperial Dam is expected to increase <br />and could reach 1,150 to 1,210 mg/L by the year 2000. ,later of 1,000 mg/L <br />or less is satisfactory for irrigating most crops, although concentrations <br />of 700 to 800 mg/L can have detrimental effects on salt--sensitive crops. <br />The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reconunends that public drinking <br />water supplies contain less than 500 mg/L. <br /> <br />Water users in the Las-Vegas-Los Angeles-San Diego area and irrigators <br />in southern California and Arizona are affected most by this salinity. Mu- <br />nicipal and industrial water users experience economic losses in the form of <br />increased water treatment costs, accelerated pipe corrosion and appliance <br />wear, increased soap and detergent needs, and decreased drinking water pal- <br />atability. For irrigators, the higher concentrations cause decreased crop <br />yields, altered cropping patterns, increased leaching and drainage re- <br />quirements, and increased management costs. Quantified losses in the Lower <br /> <br />3 <br />