My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02732
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02732
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:46:38 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:19:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.852
Description
Moapa Valley Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
NV
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/1/1981
Title
Salinity Control and Environmental Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Total cost for Alternative 2 including $506,800 for technical assistance <br />is $6,279\900. Total program cost with operation, maintenance and replace- <br />ment addea in is $883,500 annually. <br /> <br />Downstream and onfarm annual benefits increase during installation and <br />total $1,563,400 following installation. Downstream annual benefits are <br />$1,032,400 based on a reduction of 2.0 milligrams per liter in salt concen- <br />tration in the Colorado River at Imperial Dam near Yuma, Arizona. Water <br />diverted for irrigation would be reduced 5,000 acre-feet increasing instream <br />flow in Muddy River. An estimated 86 percent of this water could be applied <br />to other uses. These other uses would have an annual value of $198,000 based <br />on the value of water used for agriculture in the valley. Annual onfarm <br />benefits accruing from implementing Alternative 2 are $333,000. This includes <br />annual labor savings of $72,000. Total program benefits are $2,327,700 <br />annually ($1,563,400 for a 25-year period and $764,300 during the installation <br />period). <br /> <br />Implementation of Alternative 2 could require a 75 percent or greater <br />federal cost-share assistance to assure farmer participation. Land users <br />would furnish the remaining 25 percent or less, plus annual operation, main- <br />tenance, and replacement costs. See Table 1. High local indebtedness may <br />require substantial cost-share assistance or total federal financing for the <br />irrigation delivery system in Lower Valley. Proper irrigation water manage- <br />ment of the improved systems will be essential to achieve the salinity control <br />objectives. <br /> <br />TABLE 1. ANNUAL LEVEL OF FUNDING FOR 10-YEAR INSTALLATION PERIOD, <br />ALTERNATIVE 2, MOAPA VALLEY SUBEVALUATION UNIT, NEVADA <br /> <br />Annual Federal Funding Annual Other Funding Annual <br />---------------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------- <br />y <br />Construc- Technical Construc- y <br />tion Assistance Total tion OM&R Total Total <br />$433,000 $50,700 $483,700 $144,300 $5,300 $149,600 $633,300 <br /> <br />y July 1980 Prices - Based on 75 percent federal cost-sharing assistance. <br />y OM&R: Operation, Maintenance and Replacement. <br /> <br />002677 <br /> <br />iv <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.