WSP02694 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A -\ water control structures, to hold water during the growing season. Some sites will also have inlet water and fish control structures. Prior to spring runoff each year, most sites will be dry (or rotenoned) to control nonnative fishes to the extent possible. Most sites will also be drainable, so that fishes can be harvested to evaluate results, and so that nonnatives can be prevented from entering the main channel. In accordance with approved stocking plans, wild and/or hatchery-produced razorbacks will be stocked into the sites for rearing; and wild razorbacks will have access to the site during high flows, through the inlet or over the banks. larval razorbacks will be reared to a size that allows individual tagging (e.g., PIT-tagging), and released into the river (subject to approval by the Recovery Implementation Program). The Technical Advisory Group recommended the use of wild larvae, because: 1) Theoretically, wild larvae have already imprinted on their natal spawning site, and they will know where to go when they reach maturity; 2) Wild larvae are believed to be more fit for survival in the harsh riverine environment than are hatchery-produced fishes; and 3) They are believed to genetically represent the existing wild population. The Genetics Panel, on the other hand, recommended the use of hatchery-produced larvae, because: 1) Hatchery-produced larvae would come from known parentage, with a genetic make-up known to represent the wild population; and 2) Wild larvae might be from only a few crosses, and not genetically represent the wild population, resulting in unnatural selection and inbreeding. 3) Imprinting and fitness of hatchery-produced larvae were not discussed. I recommend implementing Objective I with both wild larvae and hatchery-produced larvae, using both floodplain habitats and rearing (hatchery) ponds. The floodplain habitats, connected to the river, would be funded by the Floodplain Habitat Restoration Program. The rearing ponds, not connected to the river, would be funded under the Propagation Element of the Recovery Implementation Program (RIP). New sites will be designed and constructed under each element of the RIP, but with different funding sources. Once the fish are reared to a size where likelihood of survival in the river is improved, they can be PIT-tagged and released. It must be understood, however, that most will never be recaptured. The fact that there are so few razorbacks, that our sampling efficiency in large rivers is so poor, and that razorbacks are less vulnerable to capture than other species, is justification for development of a sound monitoring/evaluation program with refined sampling strategies to evaluate the efficacy of the Floodplain Habitat Restoration Program. 3