My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02694
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02694
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:46:27 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:18:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.C.4
Description
UCRBRIP Flooded Bottom Lands
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1995
Author
UCRBRIP
Title
Floodplain Habitat Restoration - 1995 Work Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CSy <br /> <br />be conducted to determine other possible factors that could be limiting <br />recruitment. The information obtained from pilot studies at demonstration <br />sites will provide useful information for selecting other future sites for <br />restoration. <br /> <br />1. Select flood plains as experimental monitoring units that cover a <br />variety of features and have natural or managed access to the <br />river. Provide mainstem flow connections to currently blocked <br />historical off-channel habitats, e.g., gravel pit ponds by <br />mechanical excavation. Monitor water levels and area flooded <br />(using aerial photos); monitor short- and long-term changes in <br />flood plain and adjoining channel geomorphology. <br /> <br />2. Utilize existing (or create) drainable flood plain ponds with <br />inflow/outflow control from which all non-native fishes can be <br />eradicated and excluded. Stock with larvae collected from natural <br />reproduction ,(Green River). Rear them to a size that allows <br />individual tagging (e.g., PIT tags) and release them into Green <br />and Colorado rivers. <br /> <br />3. Study the annual and seasonal use of non-native fish in gravel pit <br />ponds with different configurations and slopes. Compare non- <br />native and native fish use in two ponds adjacent to each other and <br />that are both connected to the river--one that is 'bathtub' shaped <br />and that will hold water year round and one that is slightly <br />graded toward the mainstem river but will hold water seasonally. <br />Determine if a gravel pit pond gently graded toward the mainstem <br />river will adequately fill during spring high flows and drain <br />during recession of flows in the summer. Determine which pond <br />configuration and bottom shape will reduce or eliminate non-native <br />fish that are thought to adversely impact endangered fishes. <br /> <br />IV. Description of past performance on this or similar project. <br /> <br />In the Upper Colorado River, there has been little resear-ch and <br />management activities aimed at reconnecting historic flood plain <br />habitats to the mainstem river to benefit endangered fishes. <br />Moreover, from the literature, it appears that there has been few <br />attempts to restore historic flood plain habitat in other river <br />systems. Therefore, many of the strategies proposed for restoring <br />flood plain habitats in the Upper Colorado River Basin will be <br />untested; initially, some may not work, but certainly an adaptive <br />management approach must be used to determine those strategies <br />that will be best suited for the particular site and its <br />configuration. <br /> <br />In the Green River, Old Charley Wash (Wood's Bottom) was <br />reconnected to the mainstem and is a pilot project currently <br />underway to test the hypothesis regarding flooded bottom land <br />restoration for razorback sucker. Wydoski and Wick (1994) have <br />developed an issue paper, "Enhancement of Flooded Bottomlands and <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.