Laserfiche WebLink
<br />_CRIIJA_ - - - - - - <br />W'~ - - - - - - <br />~~ <br /> <br />}Y1[Jb~re Be Changes by the EPA? <br /> <br />other hand, could see no problem with cur- more stringent and expensive, both to enforce <br />rent laws and stated emphatically that the ad. and to implement, without providing cred- <br />ministration \\'35 at fault and not the ible health or environmental improvement or <br />Democratic Congress. Representative Camp- protection. It was generally felt by all. indud- <br />bell seemed to feel that redirecting the ErA's ing to some extent the ErA, that the regula- <br />priorities was in order and was concerned tions are becoming more oriented toward <br />with community problems. "percei\'ed risk" rather than real and proven <br />On May 12th, Herman Wooten, Program risk. Secondarily, many of the entities ex. <br />Manager for the Colorado Rural Water AS5Q- pressed a desire to be more involved in the <br />ciation, drove from his office in Pueblo to meet regulation formulating process, rather than just <br />with us in Denver. Information derived from the endpoint--caught between the regulators <br />this meeting was extremely helpful in prepar- and the consumer. <br />ing us for the meeting with the EPA, both in Mike Pompili, Assistant Health Commis- <br />regard to protocol and specific information on sioner of the City of Columbus, provided an <br />affected communities in Colorado. Later that excellent presentation using the EPA's own <br />same day, we met with Jerry Biberstine of the numbers to cite examples of the lU1feality of <br />Colorado Department of Health. His major the "perceived risks" versus real risk. For ex- <br />concern was the possible loss of Primacy and ample, if the national cancer rate is that one in <br />the problems created for everyone in the in- five persons will be stricken with cancer, then <br />dustry by having the program turned back to why are the regulations written to protect one <br />the EPA by the State. Jerry provided us with a in a million persons using theoretical data <br />copy of legislation that had just P,1SSed through instead of empirical data and utilizing a 90 <br />the State House and Senate and that will prob- percent safety factor? <br />ably be signed by the Governor lA'hich could Another point made during and after the <br />return Primacy control to the EPA if addi- meeting \vas that perhaps another method be <br />tional funding vvere not made available" found to communicate with the regulated en- <br />The meeting with the EPA Deputy Admin- tities, in addition to the Federal Register, to <br />istrator, F. Henry Habicht, and several of the provide general information, such as solicita- <br />EPA Division Directors went as scheduled on bons for comment. This was well-received by <br />May 15. We were in good company with rep- the ErA, but the problem may not be easily <br />resentatives from Columbus, Ohio, Lewiston, solved. If it weren't for organizations such as <br />Maine, Sublette County, Wyoming, and the the CRWA, most of us in the industries af- <br />State of Texas, The meeting took place in an fected wouldn't ha\'e any foreknowledge at <br />EPA conference room in Washington and, in alL <br />addition to the large audience of EPA person- This meeting \\'as one of several held recently <br />nel, the meeting was \'ideo linked to all of the by the EPA, including meeting with representa- <br />regional offices of the EPA across the country. tives from such organizations as the National <br />The format of the meeting \...as a formal Governors' As..."Ociation, the ='Jational Associa- <br />panel discl6sion with all representath'es given tion of Counties, the N'ationalleague of Cities, <br />scheduled time to introduce ourseh'es and to and the American \Vater \\'orks Association. All <br />present our concerns about current and future of these meeting are com"incing the EPA that the <br />regulations, with time allocated for questions regulated communities are ready to revolt agai.nst <br />and discu~sion, spending more money to accomplish nothing. <br />There were several issue~ brought to light The ErA, as a result of these meetings, seems <br />and many were concerns addressed by more to recognize the need for regulation changes <br />than one entity. The primary issue addressed and simplification, and may call a national <br />by all \'.."35 that the regulations are becoming (Contilluedoll PaXt' 17) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />16 <br />