Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />~ local action, but their identification is of prime importance to the <br />r:-.: <br />.... <br />~ <br />(.0) <br />~ <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />States. <br /> <br />Accordingly, the Arkansas-White-Red Ad Hoc Assessment Committee for <br /> <br />the 1975 Water Assessment has relied heavily on members from the eight <br /> <br />States for identifying and locating problems throughout the Region who <br /> <br />have consulted with State and Federal interests and others knowledgeable <br /> <br />in water problems. Seven Work Groups were organized by the Chairman of <br /> <br />the Ad Hoc Assessment Committee to prepare the problem descriptions <br /> <br />summarized in this Technical Memorandum. Each Work Group considered <br /> <br />one of the seven Aggregated Subareas (ASA's) in the region. State and <br /> <br />Federal representatives are on each work Group, with a State representative <br /> <br />selected as Chairman. Thus, the Summary of Identified Problems largely <br /> <br />is the result of the work of the eight States with assistance of Federal <br /> <br />agencies and constitutes the major portion of this Technical Memorandum. <br /> <br />While this Technical Memorandum was prepared by the Ad Hoc Assessment <br /> <br />Committee composed of State and Federal agency representatives, it does <br /> <br />not necessarily reflect the viewpoint or policy of any particular agency <br /> <br />or State. Subsequent activities of the Assessment may result in modifica- <br /> <br />tion in the list of identified problems. <br /> <br />Members of the Arkansas-White-Red Ad Hoc Assessment Committee are <br /> <br />shown in Figure 1. Members of the seven AWRBIAC Work Groups are shown <br /> <br />in Figure 2. <br /> <br />l. <br />