My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02640
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02640
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:54 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:15:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.30.B
Description
UCRBRIP Instream Flows
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1993
Author
UCRBRIP WAC
Title
Recommendations on the Legal, Policy, and Institutional Issues Related to Instream Flow Protection in Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br /> <br />(c) No Material Injury Rule. <br />(d) Conditional Rights. <br />(e) Subordination ofUSFWS Instream Row Rights. <br />(f) Conditional to Absolute Instrearn Row Conversions. <br />(g) Leases for Instream Flow. <br />(h) Decrees and Instream Row Releases. <br />(i) Salvaged and Saved Water <br />(j) Institutional Responses to Uncertainty. <br /> <br />Category III - <br /> <br />(a) "Minimum Requirements/Reasonable Degree". <br />(b) Distinctions Between Instream and Consumptive Use Rights. <br />(c) Condemnation. <br />(d) Variability in Instream Row Right Definitions. <br />(e) RIP and Other Fishery Needs. <br /> <br />The group then focused its efforts on two of the Category I issues: 1) The Impact of the Legal <br /> <br />Protection of Instream Rows on Colorado's Ability to Develop its Apportionment under the 1922 <br /> <br />Colorado River Compact and the 1948 Upper Colorado River Compact, and 2) Interim Instream <br /> <br />Row Rights, expanded to include other water acquisition strategies. Regarding the compact issue, <br /> <br />GURU II members adopted the following four-step process for addressing possible conflicts <br /> <br />between Compact apportionment and endangered fish needs: <br /> <br />Step 1. Quantification of Colorado's compact apportionment on a stream-by stream basis. <br />Step 2. Interim Instrearn Row Protection Possibilities. <br />Step 3. Detennination of Potential Conflicts. <br />Step 4. Juniper-Cross Conversion Detennination. <br /> <br />The derivation of strategies for water acquisition and their application to specific water <br /> <br />resource allocation situations in Colorado was a two-step process. The first step was to identify <br /> <br />various strategies generically, and the second was to detennine during what seasons of the year <br /> <br />each of these strategies should be applied on what rivers in Colorado. Listed below are the various <br /> <br />generic strategies identified by the group: <br /> <br />(1) Establishment of an Absolute Junior Water Right. <br />(2) Establishment of a Interim Instream WaterRight. <br />(3) Establishment of Combined Absolute and Interim Water Right. <br />(4) Acquisition of an Existing Absolute Water Right. <br />(5) Acquisition of an Existing Conditional Water Right. <br />(6) Non-federal Rights to Reservoir Storage. <br />(7) Reservoir Re-operation. <br />(8) Salvage Water. <br /> <br />At its last facilitated session in July of 1992, GURU II members detennined which of the <br /> <br />jji <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.