Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3. Project Energy Sales. Table 2 shows the RGP energy sales, <br />transmission losses, generation, and purchases for the three options for <br />Fiscal Year 1981 throu9h Fiscal Year 2034. The summer deliveries for <br />Fiscal Year 1981 through Fiscal Year 1989 are the estimated sales to <br />Plains and T or C plus an allowance of 5.5 percent of the sales for <br />transmission losses. The 5.5 percent is a commitment established by the <br />contract between Plains and the United States, by which the United States <br />is to provide power and ener9Y for the estimated transmission losses on <br />the system of Plains from the points of interconnection with the United <br />States (Albuquerque and Elephant Butte) to the delivery points which had <br />previously been on the RGP transmission system (Alamagordo, Deming, <br />Hollywood, Socorro, Tor C, and Willard). For the years after 1989, when <br />the aforementioned contract expires and no firming energy deliveries are <br />expected from the CRSP, the summer ener9Y deliveries and sales are <br />assumed to be at the Elephant Butte Switchyard, and no allowance is made <br />for transmission losses. <br /> <br />For Fiscal Year 1981, the firm energy sale is the ener9Y asso- <br />ciated with the delivery durin9 the summer season of 21,880 kW to Plains <br />at 58.2 percent load factor and 2,120 kW to T or C at approximately 69.5 <br />percent load factor (the average seasonal load factor of deliveries to T <br />or C for the 1975 through 1979 period). The latter was used as the esti- <br />mated load factor of deliveries to T or C in Fiscal Year 1981 because T <br />or C was not expected to have a supplemental suppl ier in that year. On <br />the assumption that Tor C will have a supplemental supplier after Fiscal <br />Year 1981, the firm energy sale for the Fiscal Year 1982 through 1989 <br />period was estimated to be the energy associated with the del ivery of <br />ener9Y durin9 the summer season of 21,880 kW to Plains and 2,120 kW to T <br />or C, both at 58.2 percent load factor. <br /> <br />For the Fiscal Year 1981 throu9h Fiscal Year 1989 period, it <br />has been assumed that purchases of energy will be made as needed to firm <br />up the RGP generation. As shown on Table 2, Option A is the only option <br />requiring ener9Y purchases. For the Fiscal Year 1990 through Fiscal Year <br />2034 period, it has been assumed that for all options there will be no <br />purchases of ener9Y for firming and that the sales will be equal to the <br />generation. <br /> <br />4, Project Capacity Sales. Table 3 is a tabulation of the <br />RGP capacity sales, transmission losses, generation, and purchases for <br />the three options for Fiscal Years 1981 through 2034. <br /> <br />For the summer seasons of Fiscal Years 1981 through 1989, the <br />summer capacity deliveries are at the same points -- Elephant Butte <br />Switchyard and Albuquerque -- and with the same percent of allowance for <br />transmission losses as the summer energy deliveries for Fiscal Years 1981 <br />through 1989, as described in paragraph VII, D. 3. above. For the years <br />after 1989, the summer capacity deliveries and sales are at the Elephant <br />Butte Switchyard and Albuquerque, with no allowance for the transmission <br />losses. For all years, the summer sales are 24,000 kW. <br /> <br />In the wintertime, the capacity sales are zero for Options A <br />and Band 24,000 kW for Option C, and the delivies and sales are at the <br />Elephant Butte Switchyard and Albuquerque, with no allowance for transmis- <br />sion losses. <br /> <br />_ ". -'f., # <br />U) i it ~ '1 <br /> <br />21 <br />