WSP02595 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Making nearly all changes in wording which were requested, and ....... w 0) CD Agreeing to language for an exchange on the Ilouse floor which would create an expression of legislative intent with respect to the above changes to the bill. In short, the seven states have already gone a very long way in meeting everyone's concerns. It can fairly be argued that they have done enough and have certainly negotiated in good faith. A DISCUSSION IHPORTANT TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT AS FOLLOWS: Section lea) and (b) of the bill: Section 1(a) of the bill, as reported by the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, will be deleted by the substitute amendment offered today. The bill as advanced by the committee provided that the planning of salinity control units would not be "governed" by the principles, standards, and procedures for planning water and related land resources. This amendment to the ariginal 1974 Act was not intended to prevent the Departments of the Interior and Agriculture from displaying information on the economic evaluation of salinity control units. Rather, it was only intended to make it clear that salinity control units, as with the Nation's other water quality projects, are to be evaluated and selected based on considerations other than the benefit-cost analyses to which traditional water resources development projects are subjected. Since section l(b) of the bill (Section 1 of the substitute amendment of taday) would amend the 1974 Act to make it clear that cost-effectiveness, not benefit-cost analysis, would be the economic criteria used in selecting salinity control units for construction, section l(a) is not necessary. By deleting section lea) from the bill, it is intended that all relevant information, as called for in the principles, guidelines, and standards, about a salinity control unit will be displayed in the appropriate planning documents. This will include information on all means for reducing salt loading to the Colorado River, including structural measures such as canal and lateral lining and non-structural measures such as retirement of land from irrigation by purchase from willing sellers. The committee believes that at times some non-structural solutions may be cast-effective for controlling salinity in the Colorado ,River. In these cases complete or partial alternatives to structural measures shall be considered far addressing problems and opportunities pursuant to this title. The committee expects that complete or partial alternative non-structural plans will be fully arrayed and considered as one of the candidate plans whenever structural projects are considered whenever the non-structural solutions appear to be viable. Even though cost effectiveness evaluations are to be used in analyzing salinity control units, this is not the sole criteria by which units are to be evaluated. Technical feasibility, local acceptability, and environmental considerations are also to be taken into account. Section l(b) of the bill as