Laserfiche WebLink
<br />36 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />o Route A: source, Missouri River at Fort Randall, South Dakota; route, <br />southwestward through Nebraska to terminal storage at Bonny Reservoir, <br />Colorado. <br /> <br />o Route B: source, Missouri River near St. Joseph, Missouri; route, <br />southwestward through Kansas to terminal storage on the Arkansas River <br />near Dodge City, Kansas. <br /> <br />o Route C: sources, White Ri ver at Cl arendon, Arkansas; Arkansas Ri ver <br />at Van Buren, Arkansas; Ouachita River at Camden, Arkansas; Red River <br />at Fulton, Arkansas; Sulphur River at Darden, Texas, and Sabine River <br />at Tatum, Texas; route, west and northwest across Ok 1 ahoma into the <br />Panhandl e of Texas to termi nal storage on the Canadi an Ri ver near <br />Canadian, Texas. <br /> <br />o Route D: sources, White River at Clarendon, Arkansas; Arkansas River <br />at Pine Bluff, Arkansas; Ouachita River at Camden, Arkansas; Red River <br />at Fulton, Arkansas; Sulphur River at Darden, Texas and Sabine River <br />at Tatum, Texas; route, westward through Texas to terminal storage at <br />Bull Lake, near L1 ttl efi el d, Texas (subsequently repl aced by Bl anco <br />Canyon near CrosbytDn, Texas). <br /> <br />These routes are shown in generalized form on Figure 4-5, and in more <br />detail on Figures 4-7, 4-8, 4-9 and 4-10, respectively, taken from the Corps' <br />Final Report. Two alternative routes across Kansas are shown on Figure 4-8. <br /> <br />For each route, the Corps made analyses for ranges of base flows to be <br />released past the point of diversion, diversion pumping capacities, and con- <br />servation storage capacities to determine possible yields. The complexity of <br />these interrelationships are illustrated by Figure 4-6, also excerpted from <br />the Corps' Final Report. <br />