Laserfiche WebLink
<br />32 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />and the water that would be provided for irrigation in Oklahoma Subregions I <br />and II of the High Plains Region. <br /> <br />The studies made by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board of Management <br />under Strategy Four have updated the Northern Water Conveyance System with <br />necessary adjustments to make the results compatible with the reporting and <br />aggregating requirements of the High Plains Study. All key assumptions were <br />reconciled with those in use for the High Plains Study. Delivery costs of <br />imported water were not accounted for but on~farm di stribution costs and <br />costs of pumping from a 10-foot depth were included. Allocations of costs <br />among the areas and among the uses to be served were not made by the Board. <br /> <br />The Northern Water Conveyance System as updated woul d deli ver about <br />800,000 acre-feet per year to Oklahoma Subregion I and approximately 52,000 <br />acre-feet per year to Subregion II. Construction costs for the entire <br />northern system woul d total $5.3 bi lli on in terms of 1978 doll ars, over a <br />30-year construction period. <br /> <br />Cost Estimation <br /> <br />An additional cost associated with the water transfer alternatives not <br />presented in this section relates to water distribution costs from the ter- <br />mi nal reservoi rs to the farm head gates . Di stri but i on system capital costs <br />from the terminal reservoirs to farm headgates, estimated at about $2,150 per <br />irrigated acre, are based on studies by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for <br />the Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan. <br /> <br />Environmental Effects* <br /> <br />Alternative Strategy Four--Applicable only to Nebraska and Oklahoma. <br />Could result in both positive and negative effects although weighted toward <br />latter. Depletion of source streams and those below reservoirs, coupled with <br />loss of riparian habitat, are greatest concerns. <br /> <br />* Excerpted from U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Report, November, 1981. <br />