My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02594
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02594
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:39 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:13:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/1/1982
Author
Arthur D Little Inc
Title
Six State High Plains-Ogallala Aquifer Regional Resources Study - Interbasin Water Transfer Assessments
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> Year 2020 Required Terminal <br />State/Region Water Demand Storage Dependable <br /> (AF) Yield (AF/YR) <br />Colorado 229,790 255,000 <br />Kansas 1,431,460 1,590,000 <br />Nebraska 1,865,150 2,700,000 <br />New Mexi co 400,130 445,000 <br />Oklahoma 337,440 375,000 <br />Texas 808,140 298,000 <br />Total Region 5,072,110 5,633,000 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />under alternative strategies 5A and 5B, are presented in Chapter Four. The <br />Corps selected appropri ate des i gns to provide dependabl e yi e 1 ds from ter- <br />minal storage sites sufficient to restore and maintain lands in New Mexico, <br />Oklahoma and Texas from the two southern routes (C and D); while the two <br />northern routes (A and B) were designed to meet Kansas, Colorado, Nebraska, <br />and Oklahoma needs, plus one-third of Texas' needs. <br /> <br />In consultation with the General Contractor, the Corps agreed to <br />increase the needed quantities to reflect the assumption that a 10 percent <br />loss factor woul d be used to account for probabl e losses between the ter- <br />minal reservoirs and actual on-farm delivery. The following table shows the <br />year 2020 water demand, by state, and the required terminal storage to pro- <br />vide that level of dependable yield. <br /> <br />SOURCE STORAGE <br /> <br />The use of the 1 argest avail ab 1 e source storage all ows the maxi mum <br />yield from the source river. It is also important from a cost standpoint to <br />have the source storage located as close to the source ri ver as possi b 1 e. <br />This is necessary because the pumps and pipelines which remove and carry the <br />water when available from the source stream to the source reservoir are much <br />larger than the capacity of the canal system which is designed to remove the <br />water from the source reservoir at a constant rate. <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.