Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\Jutu"'" <br /> <br />IV-51 <br />IV-52 <br />IV-53 <br /> <br />IV-54 <br /> <br />IV-55 <br /> <br />IV-56 <br /> <br />IV-57 <br /> <br />IV-58 <br /> <br />IV-59 <br /> <br />IV-60 <br /> <br />IV-61 <br /> <br />IV-62 <br /> <br />IV-63 <br /> <br />IV-64 <br /> <br />Estimated peak Season Tourist Population Wolf <br />Creek Valley Alternatives, 1995, 2005 and 2020.... <br />Total Wolf Creek Valley Population Impacts <br />Includino permarlent Residents and Touri8t~........ <br />Public sChool Enrollment Impacts Mineral and <br />Archuleta Counties 1995, 2005 and 2020............ <br />Fiscal In~ct Analysis For pagosa Springs #50 <br />Joint SChool District............................. <br />Developnent Pattern - East Fork Compared to Wolf <br />Creek valley Total Number of units on Each Site <br />Projected by year................................. <br />Cumulative Totals East Fork (13,500 SAOT) and Wolf <br />Creek Valley (ll,750 SAar) Comparison of permanent <br />and Peak Day Tourist populations By Selected <br />Years. ... ..... ........ ........................... .. .. <br /> <br />Cumulative Totals East Fork (13,500 SAar) and Wolf <br />Creek Valley (11,750 SAOT) Comparison of <br />Construction Employment....~...................... <br />Cumulative Totals East Fork (13,500 SAar) and Wolf <br />Creek Valley (ll,750 SAar) Off-Site Commercial/ <br />Office Developnent Impacts by year................ <br />Future Growth Capacity (Land Capacity) of the <br />U.S. Highway 160 Corridor as Identified in the <br />Future Growth Projection of the Corridor Ivorking <br />CCITIIIlittee'I' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />CumulatIve Impacts East Fork (13,500 SAar) and Wolf <br />Creek Valley (11 r 750 SNJr) Lo.w Enforcement <br />Personnel Requirements by County.................. <br />Cumulative Totals East Fork (13,500 SAQT) and Wolf <br />Creek Valley (ll,750 Sll,01') Revenues, Expenditures <br />and Total Fiscal Impact on Mineral County, <br />Years 1 - 15........................................ <br /> <br />Cumulative Totals East Fork (13,500 SAar) and Wolf <br />Creek Valley (11,750 SAOT) Revenues, Expenditures <br />and Total Fiscal In[act on Archuleta County <br />Years 1 - 15...................................... <br /> <br />Cllnlulative Totals East Fork (13,500 SAQT) and Wolf <br />Creek Valley (11,750 SAQT) Revenues, Expenditures <br />and Total Fiscal Irrpact on Archuleta County <br /> <br />PAGE <br /> <br />263 <br /> <br />265 <br /> <br />266 <br /> <br />268 <br /> <br />295 <br /> <br />297 <br /> <br />299 <br /> <br />302 <br /> <br />303 <br /> <br />306 <br /> <br />307 <br /> <br />308 <br /> <br />Years 1 - 15....................................... 309 <br /> <br />Curoulative Totals East Fork (13,500 SAar) and Wolf <br />Creek Valley (11,750 SAOT) Comparison of NUlTlber <br />Of School Children Generated by Project, <br /> <br />0J'l and Off site................................... <br /> <br />xxiii <br /> <br />310 <br />