Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. ,,~ I) <br />fjnc,J"V <br /> <br />Iv-6 <br /> <br />IV-7 <br /> <br />IV-8 <br /> <br />IV-9 <br /> <br />IV-IO <br /> <br />IV-ll <br /> <br />IV-12 <br /> <br />IV-13 <br /> <br />IV-14 <br />IV-15 <br /> <br />IV-16 <br />IV-17 <br /> <br />IV-IB <br /> <br />IV-19 <br /> <br />IV-20 <br /> <br />IV-2l <br /> <br />IV-22 <br /> <br />IV-23 <br />IV-24 <br /> <br />IV-25 <br /> <br />IV-26 <br /> <br />IV-27 <br />IV-2B <br /> <br />IV-29 <br /> <br />Estimated Average Annual Potential an-Site and <br />Off-Site Soil Loss Wolf Creek Valley.............. <br />Estimated Average Annual SUspended Sediment <br />Concentrations for Existing Conditions <br />Alternative One and Changes Under Alternatives <br />'!Wo and Three..................................... <br />Tvtal Estimated Average Annual SUspended Sediment <br />Yields For Existina Conditions (Alternative One) <br />And Changes Under Alternatives ~o and Three...... <br />Projected Increased Suspended sediment Load <br />in West Fork from Ski Area Developnent ........... <br />Total Suspended Particulate 24 Hour Average <br />Concentration Estimates at Wolf Creek Valley ..... <br />Carbon Monoxide Concentration Estimates at <br />Wolf Creek valley ................................ <br />Acres MfectecJ with Alternative One on Private <br /> <br />PAGE <br /> <br />175 <br /> <br />176 <br /> <br />l77 <br />178 <br /> <br />186 <br />187 <br /> <br />Service Land...................................... <br /> <br />Lalld.............................................. 194 <br /> <br />Acres MfectecJ under Alternative Two - Forest <br /> <br />Alternative ~o Timber Volume RE:moval by Type..... <br />Acres Cut Under Alternative Three 3 <br />(Without Back ~vl) - Forest Service Land........ <br />A~ternative Three Timber Volume Removal by Type... <br />Acres after Implementation of Each A~ternative <br />Compared to the Existing.......................... <br />Direct Employment, rioH Creek Valley Alternatives <br />1995-2020 ........................................ <br /> <br />Average Annual On-Site Basic Employment Wolf <br />Creek Valley, 1995, 2005 and 2020................. <br />Average /lnnual Non-Basic Employment Supporte::1 By <br />Wolf Creek Valley 1995, 2005 and 2020............. <br />Total and Peak Regional El'nPloyment Impacts Wolf <br />Creek Valley 1995, 2005 and 2020.................. <br />On-Site Housing Units, wolf Creek Valley <br />Alternatives Two and Three, 1995-2020............. <br />Housing Tenure and Mix Archuleta County. 1985-2020 <br />Cumulative Archuleta Housing Demand Wolf Creek <br />Valley I\~ternatives One - Three, 1995-2020........ <br />Wolf Creek Valley Land Use Impacts Archuleta <br />and Mineral Counties.............................. <br />Law Enforcement Personnel Requirements Mineral <br />County, l-70lf Creek Valley Alternatives, 1985-2020. <br />LEA District Revenue Projections Wolf Creek <br />Valley Alternatives............................... <br />Law Enforcement Personnel Requirerrents Archuleta <br />County, Wolf Creek Valley Alternatives, 1985-2020. <br />Wolf Creek Valley Assessed Value and Tax Revenues <br />to Mineral County, Alternatives Two and Three <br />1995-2020. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />xxi <br /> <br />195 <br />195 <br /> <br />198 <br />198 <br /> <br />199 <br /> <br />211 <br /> <br />214 <br /> <br />214 <br /> <br />215 <br /> <br />218 <br />219 <br /> <br />220 <br />22l <br /> <br />223 <br />223 <br />224 <br /> <br />230 <br />