Laserfiche WebLink
<br />N <br />lol-~ <br />N- <br />o <br /> <br />Two SHOTEL telemetry weather stations were installed to provide climatological <br />'data for calculating evapo-transpiration (ET) rates as an estimate of crop <br />consumptive use. However, access to weather information was inadequate for <br />calculating a preciseET, so the final irrigation balances for eleven <br />irrigation events will be estimates; The electronic components to monitor <br />irrigation flows on the twelve sites will be in place ,by the end of Barch 1985 <br />ready to collect irrigation data for the entire 1985 irrigation season. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />The software to handle theH&E data processing and evaluation, not commercially <br />available, is being developed locally with programming assistance from the <br />'Fort Collins Computer Center. The data handling sophistication built into ~he <br />program will improve ,as, more 'experience is gained with, data acquisition ,and <br />evaluation. Programming isprogres,sing well, but we anticipate the need, ,for a <br />great deal more programming time ,in fiscal year 1985. <br /> <br />More work is scheduled to develop and implement an economic monitoring and <br />evaluation program. An economic-evaluation worksheet similar to the ,one used <br />by SCS staff may be' a way ,to provide the baseline information on'selected <br />sites. A follow_up system need,S to be !1eveloped to track the economic impacts <br />of the onfat'lll irrigation improvements., To fully implement an H&Eeffort with <br />economic evaluation and irrigation water management ,follow-up, additional, <br />personnel will be required. <br /> <br />Fiscal year 1984.has been a valuable.learning experience for theH&E staff. <br />The new technology that allows collecting the types of information needed to <br />monitor irrigation flows,brought its own unique set of challenges as equipment <br />'was beinginstalle~ and tested. The 1985 irrigation 'season provides the oppor-, <br />'tunity for collecting data needed to provide significant new insights'into, <br />understanding irrigation improvements and design needed to provide new. levels <br />of reliability for making irrigation improvements for salinity control. <br /> <br />Uinta Basin. Utah <br /> <br />Salt load monitoring will be done on 39 'sites representing dominant soils, <br />geology, crops and irrigation systems. Data from sites with unimproved , <br />, irrigation systems and from sites before, improvement of .the ,irrigation system <br />will be the reference baseline from which salt load reduction is estimated. <br /> <br />Wildlife habitat quality and quantity is monitored on cover types for six key <br />wildlife species using habitat evaluation procedures (HEP) developed by the <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Habitat unit values calculated fromHEPdata <br />evaluate wildlife habitat quality. Vegetation trend transects and cover type, <br />mapping by electronic analysis of, remotely sensed images is used to monitor ' <br />habitat quantity. Data will be collected once every three years on ninety <br />wildlife habitat sites. Ground water will be monitored on wetlands to be <br />correlated with vegetation, wildlife habitat quality and irrigation systems. <br /> <br />-23- <br />