<br />Page 4
<br />
<br />Agriculture
<br />Resources
<br />
<br />
<br />Nebraska leads nation, once again,
<br />in number 01 cattle marketed from
<br />feedlots-4.5 million head of fed
<br />cattle in 1982.
<br />More important than national
<br />leadership is growing share of beef
<br />market concentrating in Nebraska,
<br />A year ago, this state had 19.1 % of
<br />fed cattle marketed in 13 leading
<br />cattle states, This year it has 21%.
<br />Nebraska gained in cattle on feed at
<br />twice Iowa's rate.
<br />If last year's 11% increase in cattle
<br />marketed keeps up, the state will be
<br />sending more than 10 million head
<br />to slaughter by 1990; that would
<br />increase state's corn market by
<br />more than 200 million bushels a
<br />year, about a fourth of current total
<br />crop.
<br />
<br />Implications of this trend are spelled
<br />out in new economic development
<br />study compiled by Arthur D. Little
<br />Co. for Nebraska Department of
<br />Economic Development.
<br />It notes potential shift of corn
<br />production and cattle feeding from
<br />Southern High Plains to Nebraska,
<br />as water supplies decline and pump-
<br />ing costs rise in South compared
<br />with Nebraska's,
<br />Result: Nebraska has prime op-
<br />portunities to expand meat packing
<br />and other food processing activity, a
<br />theme regularly sounded by Gov,
<br />Kerrey. Study relates:
<br />"Some meat packing companies
<br />have indicated that if they had to re-
<br />consider their recent investments in
<br />Texas and Kansas at this time, they
<br />would more than likely be looking
<br />much more favorably at Nebraska
<br />locations. "
<br />
<br />Note of caution: private study con-
<br />ducted last year in connection with
<br />Initiative 300 campaign in Nebraska
<br />found that since 1970, Nebraska's
<br />share of national fed cattle produc-
<br />tion has increased by more than 21%
<br />while Iowa's shrunk by more than
<br />35%.
<br />Good news for Nebraska, Bad
<br />news is that Iowa's decline in cattle
<br />marketing followed its 1975 legisla-
<br />tion barring corporate ownership of
<br />farms and feedlots, as Nebraska's
<br />1982 passage of Initiative 300 now
<br />bars them here, Report notes:
<br />"The reason for the striking dif-
<br />ference between the adjoining
<br />states of Nebraska and Iowa stems
<br />from the relative lack of formation of
<br />large-scale feeding in 10wa....Cor-
<br />porations are more capable of at-
<br />tracting equity capital, supporting
<br />necessary large amounts of borrow-
<br />ings, and are better able to accept
<br />and manage risk,"
<br />Report says Iowa's experience
<br />has hurt smalt feeders as well as cor-
<br />porations because new, large-scale
<br />meat packing has been discouraged
<br />from situating there. Its conclusion:
<br />"A decrease in both livestock
<br />production and processing will have
<br />tremendous negative ripple effect
<br />all throughout Nebraska's econ-
<br />omy
<br />
<br />Questions for Nebraskans: Is this
<br />an accurate account of Iowa's ex-
<br />perience? If so, are there ways it can
<br />be avoided with corporate ban in
<br />Nebraska? If not. should new con-
<br />stitutional amendment be modified
<br />to permit corporate feedlots as It al-
<br />ready permits corporate operations
<br />in poultry, alfalfa production and a
<br />number of other enterprises?
<br />
<br />New markets for Nebraska farm
<br />products are goal of Food Process-
<br />ing Research Center taking shape at
<br />University of Nebraska Institute of
<br />Agriculture and Natural Resources;
<br />boosted by Gov. Kerrey's an-
<br />nouncement at Ag 2001 inaugural
<br />that he'll push for $50,000 special
<br />appropriation in 1984 budget.
<br />
<br />Along with modest funds from
<br />Department of Economic Develop-
<br />ment and other sources, this will
<br />allow hiring of full-time person,
<br />possibly in July, to direct the opera-
<br />tion, reports Dr. Lowell Satterlee,
<br />acting director of Institute's food
<br />technology department.
<br />
<br />In addition to technical research,
<br />Satterlee says, Center will be seek-
<br />ing individual or smalt group entre-
<br />preneurs willing to venture into new
<br />food processing operations-
<br />shades of Beatrice Foods, Fairmont
<br />Foods, Dorothy Lynch, small enter-
<br />prises that grew up in Nebraska,
<br />
<br />Direct corollary of new food
<br />search, Satterlee says, is spin-off of
<br />new sources of animal feed and in-
<br />dustrial raw materials from ag prod-
<br />ucts,
<br />"We're starting on a shoestring,
<br />but we're stArting." he strltes
<br />
<br />Nebraska beef promotion expected
<br />to get off the ground with beef
<br />check-off program,
<br />Nebraska Beef Industry Develop-
<br />ment Act drawing broad support.
<br />could finally be enacted; just missed
<br />last year when session ended.
<br />LB19, heard by Agriculture Com-
<br />mittee last week, would put 25~ a
<br />head fee on all cattle sold in state;
<br />proceeds to plug Nebraska beef
<br />sale; managed by seven-member
<br />board selected from and by cattle
<br />industry.
<br />
<br />Platte River Forum should get fund-
<br />ing to pursue efforts to chart future
<br />use of water from that source.
<br />Lame duck sessicn of Congress
<br />appropriated $50,000 to Bureau of
<br />Reclamation for it; go-ahead by
<br />committees in House and Senate
<br />still needed; not seen as problem.
<br />Whopping Crane Trust counted
<br />on for another $25.(100; state might
<br />be asked to kick in same.
<br />With that. computerized study can
<br />be completed this summer.
<br />
<br />Dear Jack:
<br />
<br />Please inClude me as a charter subscriber of Nebraska Resources Report at $35 per
<br />subscription for 12 monthly issues,
<br />o I am enclosing payment of $ ($35 each) for _ subscriptions,
<br />(Make checks payable to; Nebraska Resources Report)
<br />o Please bill me for _ subscriptions.
<br />
<br />Mail NRR to;
<br />
<br />Name
<br />
<br />Address
<br />
<br />Name
<br />
<br />Address
<br />
<br />Here are some others who might like to see NRR Please send complimentary copies to:
<br />
<br />Name
<br />
<br />Address
<br />
<br />Name
<br />
<br />Address
<br />
<br />Nebraska Resources Report, P.O. Box 5948, Lincoln, NE 68505
<br />
<br />IO~d.lf\
<br />
<br />Resources Agencies
<br />
<br />
<br /> (;:, 'f...... II<> I
<br /> ,-<l'-> ~
<br /> '- ~'~ L"i' . ~
<br />.. "> ~. ..;I ,
<br />Moore Kramper Bartak Kavan
<br />f:~ ~.., r::l AtJ,
<br />f..~ ~~
<br /> \
<br />~ ~ t '~r.'
<br />..J ,YJ
<br />~:a
<br />Welsh Christensen Shaughnessy Schroeder
<br />
<br />
<br />Half the 16 members of Nebraska's
<br />Natural Resources Commission are
<br />new going into 1983.
<br />ThiS includes Paul Schroeder,
<br />Arapahoe farmer, appointed late
<br />last year to fill a vacancy.
<br />Also includes appointee of Gov.
<br />Kerrey, attorney Mike Shaughnessy
<br />of St. Paul. Mike is active in irriga-
<br />tion activities:n the Loup Basin, as is
<br />his father, Cyrus. Kerrey reappoint-
<br />ed the other two gubernatorial rep-
<br />resentatives, Richard Hahn, Grand
<br />Island businessman, and Robert
<br />Bell, general manager of Metropoli-
<br />tan Utilities District in Omaha.
<br />Members newly-elected at basin
<br />caucuses in January were:
<br />. Vince Kramper, farmer and elec-
<br />tronics dealer, Dakota City.
<br />. Milton Christensen, farmer,
<br />Omaha.
<br />. Clifford Welsh, farmer, Brule,
<br />. Donald Kavan. farmer, Morse
<br />Blulf.
<br />. Frank Bartak, farmer, Merna.
<br />. Larry Moore, farmer. Ulysses.
<br />Wayne Johnson of Cook, farmer,
<br />was re-elected to the Commission.
<br />
<br />New wrinkle coming under con-
<br />sideration for Nebraska water man-
<br />agement is the Special Improve-
<br />ment Project Area.
<br />It's been around since natural re-
<br />sources districts originated 10 years
<br />ago, but apparently none ever has
<br />been organized. Now Upper Elk-
<br />horn NRD has established an im-
<br />provement project area along the
<br />full reach of the Elkhorn through
<br />Dodge County and Nemaha NRD is
<br />looking at one in Talmage and sur-
<br />rounding rural area.
<br />Notable feature of this approach:
<br />property owners receiving benefits
<br />can be assessed at least part of total
<br />cost.
<br />Elkhorn work would be aimed at
<br />relieving flood damage to farm-
<br />steads, roads, utilities and railroad
<br />property through Dodge County
<br />and stabilizing wandering channel.
<br />Estimated cost of $1 million was put
<br />
<br />Zip Code
<br />
<br />Zip Code
<br />
<br />lip Code
<br />
<br />Zip Code
<br />
<br />on the work, an undetermined share
<br />coming from adjacent landowners
<br />In amounts varying with distance
<br />from the river. Some funds are envi-
<br />sioned from local governments, in-
<br />cluding NRD, and project sponsors
<br />have applied for state help from
<br />Water Development Fund,
<br />Talmage project would be unique
<br />in combining urban and rural prop-
<br />erty; also makes the venture more
<br />complicated, says Don Hood,
<br />Nemaha manager.
<br />Work would include building a
<br />drainageway from the town, doing
<br />channel work and clearing beaver
<br />dams, Soil Conservation Service
<br />studies put a $137,000 tag on it
<br />Public hearing was held in Decem-
<br />ber and the Nemaha NRD board will
<br />meet Feb. 16 to decide whether to
<br />proceed,
<br />Improvement project concept was
<br />included in original NRD enabling
<br />act to offset elimination of drainage
<br />districts, watershed districts and
<br />several other special purpose enti-
<br />ties. Pioneering efforts in Elkhorn
<br />and Nemaha will be watched
<br />closely.
<br />
<br />Sherman L. Lewis hasn't worked
<br />with natural resources districts be-
<br />fore-not surprising, as you have to
<br />come to Nebraska to do that, the
<br />only state that has them.
<br />Now Lewis is coming to Nebraska,
<br />as new state conservationist tor
<br />SCS, He's looking forward to oper-
<br />ating in NRD structure, recently
<br />spent most of a week here familiariz-
<br />ing himself with the districts and
<br />other aspects of new assignment
<br />He also is looking forward to help-
<br />Ing initiate the target concept with
<br />special soil conservation work in
<br />eastern Nebraska and water saving
<br />operations to the west.
<br />11'11 be a long way from his present
<br />post as SCS chief in Massachusetts
<br />-but. he says, pleasantly close to
<br />his home roots in Oklahoma. He'll
<br />be on board Feb. 28, replacing Gene
<br />Sullivan who was transferred to
<br />MississippI.
<br />
<br />J
<br />
<br />'--
<br />
<br />~~-~
<br />
<br />,~
<br />
<br />Sulk Rate
<br />U.S. Postage
<br />P A I D
<br />Lincoln, NE
<br />Permit No. 553
<br />
<br />;
<br />
<br />~~
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Nebraska
<br />
<br />Resources Report
<br />February, 1983
<br />Vol. 1 NO.2
<br />
<br />An Incisive update on Nebraska's nalural resources-water. soil, minerals. energy-and theIr applicatIOn 10 agriculture and Industry of the stale: published monthly by Nebraska Resources Report, Jack Hart. Editor.
<br />
<br />Resources Chief
<br />
<br />
<br />Raun
<br />
<br />For Nebraska's soil and water re-
<br />sources, Rob Raun could be the
<br />most important person in the state in
<br />the next four years. Raun is the
<br />prominent agriculturalist and former
<br />University of Nebraska regent lured
<br />into the position of state agriculture
<br />director by Gov. Bob Kerrey.
<br />To a degree not yet generally ap-
<br />preciated by Nebraskans, Raun will
<br />be Kerrey's top adviser on natural
<br />resources, as well as on agricultural
<br />matters. This assurance, appealing
<br />to Raun's abiding concern for these
<br />resources, was the principal reason
<br />the new governor was able to coax
<br />him off hiS tarm near Minden.
<br />Raun's resources role, particularly
<br />as it relates to water, carries im-
<br />mense implications into the Kerrey
<br />administration and through the agri-
<br />cultural fabric of the state.
<br />Kerrey has expressed a deep ap-
<br />preciation for Nebraska's soil and
<br />water. By his own admission,
<br />though, he is not broadly back-
<br />grounded in technical aspects of
<br />these resources or, more important-
<br />ly, in the political intricacies of water
<br />development issues. This is the kind
<br />of policy vacuum zealots from both
<br />sides rush to fill.
<br />Kerrey's refusal to endorse the
<br />O'Neill irrigation project in the cam'
<br />paign led water development inter-
<br />ests to fear that, as governor, he
<br />would be overly supportive of the
<br />protectionist. anti-development
<br />philosophy.
<br />Rob Raun, on the other hand, is an
<br />avid supporter of the impoundment
<br />of water in more and more locations
<br />over the state. He has been a leader
<br />of the Nebraska Water Resources
<br />Association and served on its task
<br />force for identifying sites for water
<br />storage. He has been a director of
<br />
<br />the proposed Catherland irrigation
<br />project in south central Nebraska,
<br />And he's an avowed supporter of the
<br />O'Neill project.
<br />Those who know Raun well,
<br />though, feel no one in the state could
<br />have a greater respect for soil and
<br />water and more commitment to pro-
<br />tecting them from abuse.
<br />Settling into his director of agri-
<br />culture chair recently, Raun said his
<br />general philosophies on water de-
<br />velopment are shared by his gover-
<br />nor, even though there might be
<br />some differences on specific proj-
<br />ects.
<br />So the credentials of O'Neill within
<br />the governor's office, as indeed its
<br />very survival, remain very much in
<br />question, At one point, in its lame
<br />duck session in late 1982, Congress
<br />pulled the plug on the projecfs life
<br />support system. It was restored only
<br />through the vigorous efforts of Ne-
<br />braska Congresswoman Virginia
<br />Smith and her key position on the
<br />agricultural subcommittee of the
<br />House Appropriations Committee.
<br />Should the obstacles thrown up in
<br />federal court by opponents of the
<br />project finally be overcome this
<br />year, the buck will pass SWiftly to
<br />Gov. Kerrey, The projecfs feeble
<br />condition in Congress probably
<br />could not endure indifference from
<br />the governor's office.
<br />Raun also advocates appropria-
<br />tion of "significant amounts" of state
<br />tax money for SOil and water devel-
<br />opment "when the state budget can
<br />support it." Even in tight economic
<br />times, he sees added value to con-
<br />structing projects because they
<br />would build jobs.
<br />In addition to being the governor's
<br />chief adviser on resource policy,
<br />Raun Will be Kerrey's representative
<br />on the Natural Resources Commis-
<br />sion. He will not be a voting member
<br />of the Commission but will meet with
<br />the group regularly and participate
<br />in its official deliberations.
<br />To the extent he has time to do so,
<br />Raun also will assist in coordinating
<br />the activities of other state agencies
<br />involved in natural resources. This
<br />assignment might be limited for a
<br />while, he says, because budget de-
<br />ficiencies have deterred the hiring of
<br />key assistants, including a deputy
<br />administrator of the Department of
<br />Agriculture.
<br />
<br />"Your first issue looks great I have had time to read only half of it and
<br />already I am 100% sold,"
<br />-(Former Gov.) Robert B. Crosby, Lincoln, NE
<br />"Your Nebraska Resources ReporL.is very good and will serve to keep
<br />us informed,"
<br />
<br />"First issue is great Keep it Up'"
<br />
<br />-Vance Anderson, Hastings. NE
<br />
<br />-Hal Schroeder, Lincoln. NE
<br />"Your lirst edition is excellent and I can assure you I will be a regular
<br />reader, Your pUblication can be an excellent medium for disseminating
<br />correct information on what is really going on and what the real issues
<br />are with Nebraska Wale,,"
<br />-Gerald L. Abts, President, Lindsay Manufacturing Co., Lindsay, NE
<br />This kind of response and support from readers of Vol. I, No, 1 is
<br />most gratifying, It strengthens our determination to inform concerned. ,.,
<br />people more fully of the complex and rapidly-moving events affecting .,
<br />their resources,
<br />
<br />P,S, Subscription order blank is on back page,
<br />
<br />Jack Hart, Editor
<br />
<br />Lawmakers Water Year
<br />
<br />rT-
<br />
<br />'~ #It
<br />
<br />I
<br />~
<br />~
<br />...
<br />
<br />l
<br />
<br />
<br />-------------------------------------------1 ^'" ~ - - ~~ - """""'" "'^'
<br />
<br />Nebraska Resources Report Charter Subscription
<br />I Jack Hart
<br />I Nebraska Resources Report
<br />I P,O, Box 5948
<br />I Lincoln, Nebraska 68505
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />J. l'iilliui:J r1cOoncld
<br />SlEl"csent, Bldg., Room ~23
<br />...J.j herCiJn
<br />Denver, CO 8020J
<br />
<br />Hoagland
<br />
<br />This will be a "water year" in the
<br />Nebraska Legislature with more
<br />than 20 water-related bills intro-
<br />duced, several highly significant and
<br />historically controversial.
<br />Chances appear good, though,
<br />that some of the major issues will
<br />pass. A more conciliatory attitude on
<br />water issues, more willingness to
<br />find compromise solutions, is appar-
<br />ent at this time than perhaps ever
<br />before. This is acknowledged by
<br />both urban and rural senators, city
<br />interests who have pUShed for more
<br />regulation and agriculturists who
<br />have resisted regulation.
<br />Sen, Peter Hoagland of Omaha,
<br />who has taken the lead in introduc-
<br />tion of water bills, sees both sides
<br />moving to a center position: "Urban
<br />senators have moved from the ideal-
<br />istic to the realistic; agricultural
<br />interests see the need to work col-
<br />lectively."
<br />Hoagland's bill offering includes
<br />some potentially divisive issues, in-
<br />cluding protection of in-stream
<br />flows and giving municipalities a
<br />higher preference for groundwater
<br />than is granted agricultural users.
<br />But Hoagland has stuck strictly to
<br />recommendations of the Natural
<br />Resources Commission, which he
<br />notes IS heavily rural-oriented.
<br />From the other side, rural interests
<br />in the Nebraska Water Coalition, in-
<br />cluding livestock organizations, are
<br />backing legislation for state-man-
<br />dated groundwater standards and
<br />authority for the state to impose
<br />restrictions in water-short areas if
<br />the local natural resources district
<br />does not do so. This moves signifi-
<br />cantly away from the traditional
<br />rural resistance to state regulation.
<br />Clayton Lukow of Holstein, head
<br />of the Water Coalition and chief
<br />spokesman for the new thrust. cau-
<br />tions that this does not mean rural
<br />interests have foresaken local con-
<br />frol of water matters. But it will give
<br />local officials, through NRDs, more
<br />"backbone" to institute regulations
<br />if it is understood that otherwise the
<br />state will do so, he explains,
<br />Intense pressure from landowners
<br />against water regulations can keep
<br />NRD directors from imposing regu-
<br />..Iat~ons or de.feat directors who at-
<br />tem.,t to do so, he saY~. He cites the
<br />Little Blue NRD, in which he lives,
<br />where local pressures are blamed
<br />for a two-year deferral of stricter
<br />regulations on water use.
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />"If inlense local pressure pre-
<br />cludes the proper action, then urban
<br />pressures will take over and force it
<br />on us," Lukow says, stressing that it
<br />is better for rural interests to be in-
<br />volved in setting up the fall-back
<br />mechanism for state authority.
<br />Another example of the concilia-
<br />tory attitude stems from a hotly-
<br />debated proposal last year to protect
<br />wet meadows, particularly in the
<br />Sandhills, against excessive decline
<br />in the water table. Sen, Tom Vickers
<br />of Farnam, introducer of last year's
<br />measure, says compromise efforts
<br />have led to modest changes and that
<br />the 1983 version of the bill is expect-
<br />ed to have general support.
<br />
<br />Sen. Chris Beutler of Lincoln, a
<br />pro-regulation leader of the past.
<br />says he is impressed by some efforts
<br />being made by irrigators to limit
<br />their water use. This reaction came
<br />from hearings across the state last
<br />fall by the Public Works Committee,
<br />He is especially pleased with ac-
<br />tions in the Upper Republican NRD
<br />of southwestern Nebraska where
<br />regulations of a groundwater con-
<br />trol area have been strengthened.
<br />Water use restrictions in the past few
<br />ycnrs nlrcndy have helped ~tcm
<br />
<br />water table declines there,
<br />
<br />On the other hand, Beutler pOints
<br />to Holt County in north central Ne-
<br />braska as a place where the natural
<br />resources district is "ignoring the
<br />problems." Beutler says the nitrate
<br />level in underground water there
<br />generally exceeds 20 parts per mil-
<br />lion, more than double federal mini-
<br />mum standards, He says the NRD
<br />"has no planning in effect and has
<br />not discussed instigating a program
<br />or determining what it might do."
<br />
<br />Beutler, who gave up his seat on
<br />the Public Works Committee this
<br />year to become chairman of the
<br />Judiciary, has introduced LB426 to
<br />require the state to see that an NRD
<br />takes appropriate action if the ni-
<br />trate level gets to 14 parts per mil-
<br />lion. The senator notes that this is
<br />higher than federal standards; says
<br />he's willing to adjust the rate further
<br />if necessary to get approval.
<br />Sen. Loran Schmit of Bellwood,
<br />chairman 01 the Public Works Com-
<br />mittee, is credited with contributing
<br />to the more harmonious attitude on
<br />water legislation, Starting before
<br />the Legislature convened, he has
<br />worked at building relations be-
<br />tween both ends of the hydro-politi-
<br />cal spectrum,
<br />
<br />Big Mo
<br />
<br />Missouri River is drawing new
<br />downstream attention from ship-
<br />ping interests, power companies,
<br />cities and other water groups in Mis-
<br />souri River Basin Association.
<br />Mostly private interests, they want
<br />more input in governmental deliber-
<br />ations by Missouri Basin States
<br />Association; seek meeting with state
<br />officials when that group meets in
<br />Kansas City Feb, 10, according to
<br />Randy Moody, spokesman for barge
<br />interests in Nebraska,
<br />
|