Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Agriculture <br />Resources <br /> <br /> <br />Nebraska leads nation, once again, <br />in number 01 cattle marketed from <br />feedlots-4.5 million head of fed <br />cattle in 1982. <br />More important than national <br />leadership is growing share of beef <br />market concentrating in Nebraska, <br />A year ago, this state had 19.1 % of <br />fed cattle marketed in 13 leading <br />cattle states, This year it has 21%. <br />Nebraska gained in cattle on feed at <br />twice Iowa's rate. <br />If last year's 11% increase in cattle <br />marketed keeps up, the state will be <br />sending more than 10 million head <br />to slaughter by 1990; that would <br />increase state's corn market by <br />more than 200 million bushels a <br />year, about a fourth of current total <br />crop. <br /> <br />Implications of this trend are spelled <br />out in new economic development <br />study compiled by Arthur D. Little <br />Co. for Nebraska Department of <br />Economic Development. <br />It notes potential shift of corn <br />production and cattle feeding from <br />Southern High Plains to Nebraska, <br />as water supplies decline and pump- <br />ing costs rise in South compared <br />with Nebraska's, <br />Result: Nebraska has prime op- <br />portunities to expand meat packing <br />and other food processing activity, a <br />theme regularly sounded by Gov, <br />Kerrey. Study relates: <br />"Some meat packing companies <br />have indicated that if they had to re- <br />consider their recent investments in <br />Texas and Kansas at this time, they <br />would more than likely be looking <br />much more favorably at Nebraska <br />locations. " <br /> <br />Note of caution: private study con- <br />ducted last year in connection with <br />Initiative 300 campaign in Nebraska <br />found that since 1970, Nebraska's <br />share of national fed cattle produc- <br />tion has increased by more than 21% <br />while Iowa's shrunk by more than <br />35%. <br />Good news for Nebraska, Bad <br />news is that Iowa's decline in cattle <br />marketing followed its 1975 legisla- <br />tion barring corporate ownership of <br />farms and feedlots, as Nebraska's <br />1982 passage of Initiative 300 now <br />bars them here, Report notes: <br />"The reason for the striking dif- <br />ference between the adjoining <br />states of Nebraska and Iowa stems <br />from the relative lack of formation of <br />large-scale feeding in 10wa....Cor- <br />porations are more capable of at- <br />tracting equity capital, supporting <br />necessary large amounts of borrow- <br />ings, and are better able to accept <br />and manage risk," <br />Report says Iowa's experience <br />has hurt smalt feeders as well as cor- <br />porations because new, large-scale <br />meat packing has been discouraged <br />from situating there. Its conclusion: <br />"A decrease in both livestock <br />production and processing will have <br />tremendous negative ripple effect <br />all throughout Nebraska's econ- <br />omy <br /> <br />Questions for Nebraskans: Is this <br />an accurate account of Iowa's ex- <br />perience? If so, are there ways it can <br />be avoided with corporate ban in <br />Nebraska? If not. should new con- <br />stitutional amendment be modified <br />to permit corporate feedlots as It al- <br />ready permits corporate operations <br />in poultry, alfalfa production and a <br />number of other enterprises? <br /> <br />New markets for Nebraska farm <br />products are goal of Food Process- <br />ing Research Center taking shape at <br />University of Nebraska Institute of <br />Agriculture and Natural Resources; <br />boosted by Gov. Kerrey's an- <br />nouncement at Ag 2001 inaugural <br />that he'll push for $50,000 special <br />appropriation in 1984 budget. <br /> <br />Along with modest funds from <br />Department of Economic Develop- <br />ment and other sources, this will <br />allow hiring of full-time person, <br />possibly in July, to direct the opera- <br />tion, reports Dr. Lowell Satterlee, <br />acting director of Institute's food <br />technology department. <br /> <br />In addition to technical research, <br />Satterlee says, Center will be seek- <br />ing individual or smalt group entre- <br />preneurs willing to venture into new <br />food processing operations- <br />shades of Beatrice Foods, Fairmont <br />Foods, Dorothy Lynch, small enter- <br />prises that grew up in Nebraska, <br /> <br />Direct corollary of new food <br />search, Satterlee says, is spin-off of <br />new sources of animal feed and in- <br />dustrial raw materials from ag prod- <br />ucts, <br />"We're starting on a shoestring, <br />but we're stArting." he strltes <br /> <br />Nebraska beef promotion expected <br />to get off the ground with beef <br />check-off program, <br />Nebraska Beef Industry Develop- <br />ment Act drawing broad support. <br />could finally be enacted; just missed <br />last year when session ended. <br />LB19, heard by Agriculture Com- <br />mittee last week, would put 25~ a <br />head fee on all cattle sold in state; <br />proceeds to plug Nebraska beef <br />sale; managed by seven-member <br />board selected from and by cattle <br />industry. <br /> <br />Platte River Forum should get fund- <br />ing to pursue efforts to chart future <br />use of water from that source. <br />Lame duck sessicn of Congress <br />appropriated $50,000 to Bureau of <br />Reclamation for it; go-ahead by <br />committees in House and Senate <br />still needed; not seen as problem. <br />Whopping Crane Trust counted <br />on for another $25.(100; state might <br />be asked to kick in same. <br />With that. computerized study can <br />be completed this summer. <br /> <br />Dear Jack: <br /> <br />Please inClude me as a charter subscriber of Nebraska Resources Report at $35 per <br />subscription for 12 monthly issues, <br />o I am enclosing payment of $ ($35 each) for _ subscriptions, <br />(Make checks payable to; Nebraska Resources Report) <br />o Please bill me for _ subscriptions. <br /> <br />Mail NRR to; <br /> <br />Name <br /> <br />Address <br /> <br />Name <br /> <br />Address <br /> <br />Here are some others who might like to see NRR Please send complimentary copies to: <br /> <br />Name <br /> <br />Address <br /> <br />Name <br /> <br />Address <br /> <br />Nebraska Resources Report, P.O. Box 5948, Lincoln, NE 68505 <br /> <br />IO~d.lf\ <br /> <br />Resources Agencies <br /> <br /> <br /> (;:, 'f...... II<> I <br /> ,-<l'-> ~ <br /> '- ~'~ L"i' . ~ <br />.. "> ~. ..;I , <br />Moore Kramper Bartak Kavan <br />f:~ ~.., r::l AtJ, <br />f..~ ~~ <br /> \ <br />~ ~ t '~r.' <br />..J ,YJ <br />~:a <br />Welsh Christensen Shaughnessy Schroeder <br /> <br /> <br />Half the 16 members of Nebraska's <br />Natural Resources Commission are <br />new going into 1983. <br />ThiS includes Paul Schroeder, <br />Arapahoe farmer, appointed late <br />last year to fill a vacancy. <br />Also includes appointee of Gov. <br />Kerrey, attorney Mike Shaughnessy <br />of St. Paul. Mike is active in irriga- <br />tion activities:n the Loup Basin, as is <br />his father, Cyrus. Kerrey reappoint- <br />ed the other two gubernatorial rep- <br />resentatives, Richard Hahn, Grand <br />Island businessman, and Robert <br />Bell, general manager of Metropoli- <br />tan Utilities District in Omaha. <br />Members newly-elected at basin <br />caucuses in January were: <br />. Vince Kramper, farmer and elec- <br />tronics dealer, Dakota City. <br />. Milton Christensen, farmer, <br />Omaha. <br />. Clifford Welsh, farmer, Brule, <br />. Donald Kavan. farmer, Morse <br />Blulf. <br />. Frank Bartak, farmer, Merna. <br />. Larry Moore, farmer. Ulysses. <br />Wayne Johnson of Cook, farmer, <br />was re-elected to the Commission. <br /> <br />New wrinkle coming under con- <br />sideration for Nebraska water man- <br />agement is the Special Improve- <br />ment Project Area. <br />It's been around since natural re- <br />sources districts originated 10 years <br />ago, but apparently none ever has <br />been organized. Now Upper Elk- <br />horn NRD has established an im- <br />provement project area along the <br />full reach of the Elkhorn through <br />Dodge County and Nemaha NRD is <br />looking at one in Talmage and sur- <br />rounding rural area. <br />Notable feature of this approach: <br />property owners receiving benefits <br />can be assessed at least part of total <br />cost. <br />Elkhorn work would be aimed at <br />relieving flood damage to farm- <br />steads, roads, utilities and railroad <br />property through Dodge County <br />and stabilizing wandering channel. <br />Estimated cost of $1 million was put <br /> <br />Zip Code <br /> <br />Zip Code <br /> <br />lip Code <br /> <br />Zip Code <br /> <br />on the work, an undetermined share <br />coming from adjacent landowners <br />In amounts varying with distance <br />from the river. Some funds are envi- <br />sioned from local governments, in- <br />cluding NRD, and project sponsors <br />have applied for state help from <br />Water Development Fund, <br />Talmage project would be unique <br />in combining urban and rural prop- <br />erty; also makes the venture more <br />complicated, says Don Hood, <br />Nemaha manager. <br />Work would include building a <br />drainageway from the town, doing <br />channel work and clearing beaver <br />dams, Soil Conservation Service <br />studies put a $137,000 tag on it <br />Public hearing was held in Decem- <br />ber and the Nemaha NRD board will <br />meet Feb. 16 to decide whether to <br />proceed, <br />Improvement project concept was <br />included in original NRD enabling <br />act to offset elimination of drainage <br />districts, watershed districts and <br />several other special purpose enti- <br />ties. Pioneering efforts in Elkhorn <br />and Nemaha will be watched <br />closely. <br /> <br />Sherman L. Lewis hasn't worked <br />with natural resources districts be- <br />fore-not surprising, as you have to <br />come to Nebraska to do that, the <br />only state that has them. <br />Now Lewis is coming to Nebraska, <br />as new state conservationist tor <br />SCS, He's looking forward to oper- <br />ating in NRD structure, recently <br />spent most of a week here familiariz- <br />ing himself with the districts and <br />other aspects of new assignment <br />He also is looking forward to help- <br />Ing initiate the target concept with <br />special soil conservation work in <br />eastern Nebraska and water saving <br />operations to the west. <br />11'11 be a long way from his present <br />post as SCS chief in Massachusetts <br />-but. he says, pleasantly close to <br />his home roots in Oklahoma. He'll <br />be on board Feb. 28, replacing Gene <br />Sullivan who was transferred to <br />MississippI. <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />'-- <br /> <br />~~-~ <br /> <br />,~ <br /> <br />Sulk Rate <br />U.S. Postage <br />P A I D <br />Lincoln, NE <br />Permit No. 553 <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Nebraska <br /> <br />Resources Report <br />February, 1983 <br />Vol. 1 NO.2 <br /> <br />An Incisive update on Nebraska's nalural resources-water. soil, minerals. energy-and theIr applicatIOn 10 agriculture and Industry of the stale: published monthly by Nebraska Resources Report, Jack Hart. Editor. <br /> <br />Resources Chief <br /> <br /> <br />Raun <br /> <br />For Nebraska's soil and water re- <br />sources, Rob Raun could be the <br />most important person in the state in <br />the next four years. Raun is the <br />prominent agriculturalist and former <br />University of Nebraska regent lured <br />into the position of state agriculture <br />director by Gov. Bob Kerrey. <br />To a degree not yet generally ap- <br />preciated by Nebraskans, Raun will <br />be Kerrey's top adviser on natural <br />resources, as well as on agricultural <br />matters. This assurance, appealing <br />to Raun's abiding concern for these <br />resources, was the principal reason <br />the new governor was able to coax <br />him off hiS tarm near Minden. <br />Raun's resources role, particularly <br />as it relates to water, carries im- <br />mense implications into the Kerrey <br />administration and through the agri- <br />cultural fabric of the state. <br />Kerrey has expressed a deep ap- <br />preciation for Nebraska's soil and <br />water. By his own admission, <br />though, he is not broadly back- <br />grounded in technical aspects of <br />these resources or, more important- <br />ly, in the political intricacies of water <br />development issues. This is the kind <br />of policy vacuum zealots from both <br />sides rush to fill. <br />Kerrey's refusal to endorse the <br />O'Neill irrigation project in the cam' <br />paign led water development inter- <br />ests to fear that, as governor, he <br />would be overly supportive of the <br />protectionist. anti-development <br />philosophy. <br />Rob Raun, on the other hand, is an <br />avid supporter of the impoundment <br />of water in more and more locations <br />over the state. He has been a leader <br />of the Nebraska Water Resources <br />Association and served on its task <br />force for identifying sites for water <br />storage. He has been a director of <br /> <br />the proposed Catherland irrigation <br />project in south central Nebraska, <br />And he's an avowed supporter of the <br />O'Neill project. <br />Those who know Raun well, <br />though, feel no one in the state could <br />have a greater respect for soil and <br />water and more commitment to pro- <br />tecting them from abuse. <br />Settling into his director of agri- <br />culture chair recently, Raun said his <br />general philosophies on water de- <br />velopment are shared by his gover- <br />nor, even though there might be <br />some differences on specific proj- <br />ects. <br />So the credentials of O'Neill within <br />the governor's office, as indeed its <br />very survival, remain very much in <br />question, At one point, in its lame <br />duck session in late 1982, Congress <br />pulled the plug on the projecfs life <br />support system. It was restored only <br />through the vigorous efforts of Ne- <br />braska Congresswoman Virginia <br />Smith and her key position on the <br />agricultural subcommittee of the <br />House Appropriations Committee. <br />Should the obstacles thrown up in <br />federal court by opponents of the <br />project finally be overcome this <br />year, the buck will pass SWiftly to <br />Gov. Kerrey, The projecfs feeble <br />condition in Congress probably <br />could not endure indifference from <br />the governor's office. <br />Raun also advocates appropria- <br />tion of "significant amounts" of state <br />tax money for SOil and water devel- <br />opment "when the state budget can <br />support it." Even in tight economic <br />times, he sees added value to con- <br />structing projects because they <br />would build jobs. <br />In addition to being the governor's <br />chief adviser on resource policy, <br />Raun Will be Kerrey's representative <br />on the Natural Resources Commis- <br />sion. He will not be a voting member <br />of the Commission but will meet with <br />the group regularly and participate <br />in its official deliberations. <br />To the extent he has time to do so, <br />Raun also will assist in coordinating <br />the activities of other state agencies <br />involved in natural resources. This <br />assignment might be limited for a <br />while, he says, because budget de- <br />ficiencies have deterred the hiring of <br />key assistants, including a deputy <br />administrator of the Department of <br />Agriculture. <br /> <br />"Your first issue looks great I have had time to read only half of it and <br />already I am 100% sold," <br />-(Former Gov.) Robert B. Crosby, Lincoln, NE <br />"Your Nebraska Resources ReporL.is very good and will serve to keep <br />us informed," <br /> <br />"First issue is great Keep it Up'" <br /> <br />-Vance Anderson, Hastings. NE <br /> <br />-Hal Schroeder, Lincoln. NE <br />"Your lirst edition is excellent and I can assure you I will be a regular <br />reader, Your pUblication can be an excellent medium for disseminating <br />correct information on what is really going on and what the real issues <br />are with Nebraska Wale,," <br />-Gerald L. Abts, President, Lindsay Manufacturing Co., Lindsay, NE <br />This kind of response and support from readers of Vol. I, No, 1 is <br />most gratifying, It strengthens our determination to inform concerned. ,., <br />people more fully of the complex and rapidly-moving events affecting ., <br />their resources, <br /> <br />P,S, Subscription order blank is on back page, <br /> <br />Jack Hart, Editor <br /> <br />Lawmakers Water Year <br /> <br />rT- <br /> <br />'~ #It <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br />~ <br />... <br /> <br />l <br /> <br /> <br />-------------------------------------------1 ^'" ~ - - ~~ - """""'" "'^' <br /> <br />Nebraska Resources Report Charter Subscription <br />I Jack Hart <br />I Nebraska Resources Report <br />I P,O, Box 5948 <br />I Lincoln, Nebraska 68505 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />J. l'iilliui:J r1cOoncld <br />SlEl"csent, Bldg., Room ~23 <br />...J.j herCiJn <br />Denver, CO 8020J <br /> <br />Hoagland <br /> <br />This will be a "water year" in the <br />Nebraska Legislature with more <br />than 20 water-related bills intro- <br />duced, several highly significant and <br />historically controversial. <br />Chances appear good, though, <br />that some of the major issues will <br />pass. A more conciliatory attitude on <br />water issues, more willingness to <br />find compromise solutions, is appar- <br />ent at this time than perhaps ever <br />before. This is acknowledged by <br />both urban and rural senators, city <br />interests who have pUShed for more <br />regulation and agriculturists who <br />have resisted regulation. <br />Sen, Peter Hoagland of Omaha, <br />who has taken the lead in introduc- <br />tion of water bills, sees both sides <br />moving to a center position: "Urban <br />senators have moved from the ideal- <br />istic to the realistic; agricultural <br />interests see the need to work col- <br />lectively." <br />Hoagland's bill offering includes <br />some potentially divisive issues, in- <br />cluding protection of in-stream <br />flows and giving municipalities a <br />higher preference for groundwater <br />than is granted agricultural users. <br />But Hoagland has stuck strictly to <br />recommendations of the Natural <br />Resources Commission, which he <br />notes IS heavily rural-oriented. <br />From the other side, rural interests <br />in the Nebraska Water Coalition, in- <br />cluding livestock organizations, are <br />backing legislation for state-man- <br />dated groundwater standards and <br />authority for the state to impose <br />restrictions in water-short areas if <br />the local natural resources district <br />does not do so. This moves signifi- <br />cantly away from the traditional <br />rural resistance to state regulation. <br />Clayton Lukow of Holstein, head <br />of the Water Coalition and chief <br />spokesman for the new thrust. cau- <br />tions that this does not mean rural <br />interests have foresaken local con- <br />frol of water matters. But it will give <br />local officials, through NRDs, more <br />"backbone" to institute regulations <br />if it is understood that otherwise the <br />state will do so, he explains, <br />Intense pressure from landowners <br />against water regulations can keep <br />NRD directors from imposing regu- <br />..Iat~ons or de.feat directors who at- <br />tem.,t to do so, he saY~. He cites the <br />Little Blue NRD, in which he lives, <br />where local pressures are blamed <br />for a two-year deferral of stricter <br />regulations on water use. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />"If inlense local pressure pre- <br />cludes the proper action, then urban <br />pressures will take over and force it <br />on us," Lukow says, stressing that it <br />is better for rural interests to be in- <br />volved in setting up the fall-back <br />mechanism for state authority. <br />Another example of the concilia- <br />tory attitude stems from a hotly- <br />debated proposal last year to protect <br />wet meadows, particularly in the <br />Sandhills, against excessive decline <br />in the water table. Sen, Tom Vickers <br />of Farnam, introducer of last year's <br />measure, says compromise efforts <br />have led to modest changes and that <br />the 1983 version of the bill is expect- <br />ed to have general support. <br /> <br />Sen. Chris Beutler of Lincoln, a <br />pro-regulation leader of the past. <br />says he is impressed by some efforts <br />being made by irrigators to limit <br />their water use. This reaction came <br />from hearings across the state last <br />fall by the Public Works Committee, <br />He is especially pleased with ac- <br />tions in the Upper Republican NRD <br />of southwestern Nebraska where <br />regulations of a groundwater con- <br />trol area have been strengthened. <br />Water use restrictions in the past few <br />ycnrs nlrcndy have helped ~tcm <br /> <br />water table declines there, <br /> <br />On the other hand, Beutler pOints <br />to Holt County in north central Ne- <br />braska as a place where the natural <br />resources district is "ignoring the <br />problems." Beutler says the nitrate <br />level in underground water there <br />generally exceeds 20 parts per mil- <br />lion, more than double federal mini- <br />mum standards, He says the NRD <br />"has no planning in effect and has <br />not discussed instigating a program <br />or determining what it might do." <br /> <br />Beutler, who gave up his seat on <br />the Public Works Committee this <br />year to become chairman of the <br />Judiciary, has introduced LB426 to <br />require the state to see that an NRD <br />takes appropriate action if the ni- <br />trate level gets to 14 parts per mil- <br />lion. The senator notes that this is <br />higher than federal standards; says <br />he's willing to adjust the rate further <br />if necessary to get approval. <br />Sen. Loran Schmit of Bellwood, <br />chairman 01 the Public Works Com- <br />mittee, is credited with contributing <br />to the more harmonious attitude on <br />water legislation, Starting before <br />the Legislature convened, he has <br />worked at building relations be- <br />tween both ends of the hydro-politi- <br />cal spectrum, <br /> <br />Big Mo <br /> <br />Missouri River is drawing new <br />downstream attention from ship- <br />ping interests, power companies, <br />cities and other water groups in Mis- <br />souri River Basin Association. <br />Mostly private interests, they want <br />more input in governmental deliber- <br />ations by Missouri Basin States <br />Association; seek meeting with state <br />officials when that group meets in <br />Kansas City Feb, 10, according to <br />Randy Moody, spokesman for barge <br />interests in Nebraska, <br />