Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~,-""""",,;;---,-----:~,-- <br /> <br />----... ';"=,~'.-=<-,,..-~. ,-' "._---~:.~'~.'-~.~- <br /> <br />.~r7X~~~~-~~.~_-:....,---..,' '_:~-::;~-' .._n <br /> <br />-'-~. ~,." ",. <br /> <br />-:.~,: -~~~~-r~~" --::~- <br />. .- '<:--F"- ~ - <br /> <br />-~~<~ <br /> <br />QO <br />N <br />N <br />N <br />c:.. <br />. <br /> <br />29. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />equipment at the steam plant, two mileu of baok transmis- <br />sion to the nearest receiving station and step down equip- <br />ment at the receiving station. There is a point of diff- <br />erence between Mr. Sands and myself regarding the amount of <br />back transmission required. The inclusion of additional <br />back transmission from the receiving station to the terminal <br />receiving station of the Boulder transmission line as in- <br />cluded in Mr. Sands' report cannot be Justified. If so, <br />it would be Just as logical to assume that additional costs <br />should be added to the Boulder Transmission coBt to de. <br />liver Boulder power at the steam plant site, and possibly <br />more logical, since Boulder power is competing with steam <br />power. There are only two possible assumptions which can <br />be justified in the determination of the value of falling <br />water for primary energy; either additional transmission <br />costs must be added to both steam plant and the Boulder <br />Transmission Line to deliver the power where it is actually <br />used, which will be very difficult if not impossible to <br />calculate, or, the method used by the Bureau should be <br />adopted, namely, that power delivered to any receiving sta- <br />tion on its 132,000 volt belt system, which ultimately will <br />encircle the city connecting all sources of power, is the <br /> <br />delivery point for any source of pOTIer. <br /> <br />It is interesting to note that the value of falling <br /> <br />water for primary energy by the hypothetical method used by <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A. B. Roberts <br />