WSP02511 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.' y;:rr<" -' ""...~ < "'. Orl253', still stand aloof from joining other Basin states in common cause. CAP's troubles are right at home in Arizona under the Gazette's nose. . ." The Young-Martin Article Even while the storm over the proposed "super-dam" was subsiding, a new storm blew up over an article attacking CAP as uneconomical and unnecessary. It wasn't the attack that caused the tempest so much as the fact that it came from two University of Arizona faculty members and appeared in a U. of A. publication, Arizona RcdclO. The authors were, Drs. Robert A. Young and William Martin, associate professors of agricultural economics. They contended that the state had enough groundwater to support economic growth for 170 years. They also argued that CAP would subsidize farmers at the expense of municipalities and industry. "The water crisis in Arizona is not as widespread as some believe," said the authors. Nor, they said, had CAP been "clearly established as a satis- factory solution to the problems which in fact do exist." Alter- natives to CAP were available which would permit the economic growth of the state to continue "at its recent rapid rate," said Drs. Young and Martin. The two U. of A. faculty members advocated gradual eIim- ination of food and feed g-rains and forage crops because they used too much water for the amount of financial return. In their stead Arizona farmers were urged to grow cotton, vegetables, citrus and other fruits which, said the authors, would produce fnur or five times the amount of personal income per acre-foot of water used. The reactions to the Young-Martin article were, to say the least, brisk. The Water Resources Committee of the Tucson Chamber of Commerce held a special meeting and issued a statement that took sharp issue with the two professors. The committee said that in talking about underground water supply, they failed to point out that much of the water was poorly located for use in populated centers and too poor in quality to be used for people or ind ustry. The committee also emphasized that it wasn't just for agriculture that CAP was needed but to accommodate the rapid immigration and' industrialization being experienced by Arizona. If, said the committee, Arizona did not take steps to utilize the water legally apportioned to it, it might lose the water "by inaction." James L. Knickerbocker, of the Tucson Gas and Electric Co., said he thought some of the points raised by Drs. Young and Martin were worthy of thought. But Ashby Lohse, Tucson lawyer and former member of the Arizona Interstate Strea~ Commission, insisted that "anything that hurts the Central ArI- zona Project hurts us and we should fight it." The committee also voted to advise Secretary Udall that it opposed his idea of financing CAP with an ad valorem tax levied -60- l