WSP02511 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'0'0-25'!S and Eisenhower administrations. They spent millions of dollars, he said, but brought about no developments. Congressman Hosmer sll.id the water study plan was "not buying progress but buying delay," "Why," he demanded, "should Congress sit paralyzed on the sidelines while some sociological group studies the wllter problems for five years?" , Secretary Udall's testimony brought to light a disagreement within his department over the dams. The Bureau of Reclama- tion wanted them while the Park Service opposed them. It was, o admitted Mr. Udllll wryly, "ll beaut of a dispute." (The New York Times commented later on the fact that Reclamation Bureau personnel accompanied Mr. UdaIl to the hearing but not Park Service personnel.) The second dllY of the hellring- also saw the introduction of a statement by Governor WiIlillms, presented to the subcom- mittee by Arizonll's three House members. He said Arizona's needs were critical, and continued: "We have already devoured vast quantities of our groundwater while waiting for our full share of Colorado River water. Whllt mig-ht have been ll. sus- tained source of water for occasional use in emergency years . now has been dangerously depleted by continuous use." The governor said Arizonll. WllS resolved to tread "the rocky path of aloneness" if no federal help was forthcoming. And, he said, it was not impossible for the state to achieve its end by this route, ,"as our neig-hbors in California have proved so well with their own self-dependent accomplishments.~! Governor Williams said CAP, as then designed, would "meet the urg-ent water needs of people-not cows and carrots and cantaloupes." In a few short years, he said, Arizona's com- munities and industries would depend "for their very existence" . . . on Colorado River water. Wyoming for It-with Strings Attached Wyoming- g-llve CAP its support on the third day of the hearing-but with a qualification so difficult of attainment that it made the indorsement almost meaningless. Gov. Stanley K. Hathaway told the subcommittee that Wyoming would support CAP if the legislation contained a provision for augmenting the supply of water in the Colorado River with water from northern . California. He sll.id Wyoming preferred the inclusion of the two dams in CAP legislation. He also gave voice to the apprehension that a national water commission would be dominated by East- erners who would not consider the West's water problems. To , this Congressman Saylor of Pennsylvania replied, "Easterners "':.'ij;."are being asked to pick up the tab for these water projects, but ::!;~;:;;:I;your attitude is that Easterners must hlwe no say in the studies." .. ';,i.s~yeral congressmen called the Wyoming position "selfish" and tlh,>~roposal for diverting northern California waters "vague" .', ':;t'impossible." "~J!l.:, ... ,,1.1-, 55 .""1' -- fl'" ~~~'1 i-'.. !::;\i~ :.