Laserfiche WebLink
<br />;lto\zs~' <br /> <br />-.'''''.' '\~~.... <br /> <br />ment and expansion. I have approached the various proposals to <br />enact the Central Arizona Project legislation with these views <br />in mind." <br /> <br />Aspinall Bill Goes In <br /> <br />While the, administration and the Arizona and Washington <br />senators were launching their bills in the Senate, Chairman <br />Aspinall of the House Interior Committee submitted his own <br />version to the House. It was considerH.bly larg-er in scope, pro- <br />viding for Hualapai Dam and five Colorado projects and calling <br />for an appropriation of $2.167 billion. And in Seattle, at about <br />the same time, an Arizona spokesman argued the state's case <br />for water, hoping to neutralize opposition to an interstate diver- <br />sion. Rich Johnson told the American Society of Range Manage- <br />ment that Arizona's wRter shortage could not be considered a <br />purely "local" problem for two reasons: (1) The state's popu- <br />lation WllS growing because of the 'great migration westward,' <br />and (2) other parts of the country depended on the Southwest <br />for food production. "Some of our neigh bors outside the South- <br />west hllve suggested that the answer to our water problem is <br />to simply stop growing," said Mr. Johnson. "Of course, this <br />is provincial and defeatist advice-and also uneconomical as <br />well as socially and politically impractical for a democratic <br />society." He said Arizona did not propose to solve its water, <br />problem at the expense of another section of the country. But <br />then, he observed, neither should other sections withhold water <br />they could' not use if real needs existed elsewhere. "I suggest," <br />. said Mr. Johnson, "that the water needs of the Southwest are <br />. the needs of the nation for the production potential of the <br />region." <br /> <br />Visiting his home state to be on hand' to welcome Vice <br />President Humphrey, Secretary Udall expressed confidence in <br />an interview that "we will get a Central Arizona Project this <br />year," although he wouldn't speculate as to what the bilI might <br />contain. "I think," he said, "that since the administration un- <br />veiled its proposal for a simple Central Arizona Project three <br />weeks ago, a lot of members of Congress are thinking of Ari- <br />zona's water needs. That proposal embodies many elements <br />for compromise. This means that the chances of getting a project <br />approved this year are very good. I will be very disappointed <br />if we don't." Secretary Udall thought nevertheless that the <br />sponsors of the go-it-ll.]one bill in the legislature were "doing <br />a service by calling attention to the great need for water in the <br />state and by positive action showing that Arizona has an <br />alternative." <br /> <br />Mr. Mehren Sees Some Flaws <br /> <br />At the moment, the alternative was getting considerably <br />more attention than the federal proposal that Secretary Udall <br />had helped fashion. Nor was it entirely favorable. As the state <br /> <br />-46- <br /> <br />