Laserfiche WebLink
<br />oa2:5~~' '. <br /> <br />California Offers Its Version <br /> <br />On Februllry 7 " new Colorado River bill was introduced <br />in the Senate by Sen"tor Kuchel. It bore the imprimatur of the <br />Colorado River Board of California and contained what the <br />l.'dall Pllckage did not: Hualapai Dam (but not Marble Can- <br />yon), a water diversion study, a 4.4-million-acre-foot guarantee <br />for California and a ban on FPC licensing of any dams between <br />L:lke Mead and Glen Canyon. Sen"tor Kuchel said the bill had <br />the approval of California's new governor, Ronald Reagan, who, <br />said the senS'ltor, considered the me"sure to meet three prime <br />requirements: (1) Meaningful steps to augment the inadequate <br />flows of the Colorado River; (2) protection of existing Lower <br />Basin uses, including 4.4 million acre feet annually for Cali- <br />fnrnia, and (3) recognition that dependable water supply in <br />the lower Colorado Basin was insufficient both for existing uses <br />and the proposed new Central Arizona Project. <br /> <br />Speaking in his home state a few days after he introduced <br />his bill. Senator Kuchel s"id its passage was an absolute must <br />if'there was to be enough water for California's expected popu- <br />lation of 50 million by the year 2000. He said the Udall plan <br />,Vas little more than a "stripped down" proposal for building <br />CAP, and construction of the project without any guarantees <br />for augmentation of the river's water supply "would spell dis- <br />aster to the remaining Basin states." "There is no sound reason," <br />said Sen"tor Kuchel. "for shifting the use of water from its <br />historical uses-tHking it off the table in Los Angeles and off <br />land in Coachella Valley-merely to service new uses in Phoenix <br />and Tucson." <br /> <br />On February i3 the months of talk and plannIng relative <br />to.a go-it-alone approach came finally to a head with theintro- <br />duction of a bill in the Arizon" legislature to enable the state <br />to build CAP itself. Sponsored in the Senate by that body's <br />Committee on Natural Resources, the bill proposed to authorize <br />the Arizona Power Authority to build the two dams and work <br />jointly with the Arizona Interstate Stream Commission to finance <br />the big project at an estimated cost of $823 million. Fifty-year <br />revenue bonds would be issued to finance it, ",nd the bonds <br />would be retired throuJrh the sale of water and of electricity <br />produced by the dams. Other works specified in the bill included <br />Granite Reef aqueduct to bring the water from Lake Havasu to <br />Granite Reef dam northeast of Phoenix, Orme Dam reservoir <br />on the Salt River Indian Reservation, Buttes Dam reservoir on <br />the Gila River southeast of Phoenix, the, Salt-Gila aqueduct from <br />Granite Reef to Picacho Reservoir and thence to Tucson by <br />aqueduct and Charleston Dam on the San Pedro River southeast <br />of Tucson. A number of pump storage projects also would be <br />developed along the main canal. <br /> <br />-44- <br />