Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:,~'~"{"lljfj";" <br /> <br />,r I' <br />o~~'5irr .. <br /> <br />Californians introduced the other bill, which duplicated the one <br />that hlld died in the Rules Committee in 1966. It provided for <br />both dams, an import study and Upper Basin projects. <br /> <br />There were also developments occasioned by the fact that <br />a congressional moratorium on the building of Colorado River <br />dams had expired December 31. The Interior Department ad- <br />vised the Federal Power Commission that it would want to be, <br />heard in opposition if the Arizona Power Authority came back <br />asking for a license to build Marble Canyon Dam. "Congres- . <br />sional and national interest in the problem of the Lower Colo- <br />rado River has reached a new crescendo of intensity," said <br />Interior in its petition to the FPC. And an Eastern congressman, <br />Rep. Richard L. Ottinger (D-N.Y.), introduced a bill asking for <br />. a second moratorium, this one to last three years. <br /> <br />A Friendlier Chairman? <br /> <br />A modestly hopeful development in Arizona eyes was the <br />accession of Rep. Harold T. Johnson (D-Calif.) to the chair- <br />manship of the House Reclamation Subcommittee, which would <br />C'onsider the CAP bills. He succeeded Representative Rogers of <br />Texas, who retired from Congress. Mr. Johnson's district was <br />one in which the big Auburn-Folsom South Project-authorized <br />in 1965-was located. Senator Hayden had given the project <br />his blessing, in its passage through the Senate, and Congressman <br />Rhodes, asa member of the House Appropriations Committee, <br />helped Mr: Johnson get money for the project. It went without <br />. saying that Arizonans hoped for a (jll.id p1'O quo. from Mr. Johnson. <br /> <br />If, however, CAP again got bogged down in the new Con- . <br />gress, machinery was in motion to start Arizona on the go-it- <br />alone path. Spokesmen for the Arizona Interstate Stream Com- <br />mission and Arizona Power Authority told the Natural Resources <br />Committee of the Arizona Senate that legislation for a state- <br />,financed project would be submitted in two weeks. And, they <br />said, they felt confident that such an approach was feasible. <br />.John Smith, chairman of the Power' Authority, said the state <br />could pay for the entire project with the sale of electricity if <br />it was allowed to build both dams. The cost would be about <br />$828 million and the project would take about seven years to <br />complete, he said. <br /> <br />The Senate committee talked about the possibility of pass- <br />ing a memorial to Congress, notifying it that Arizona intended <br />to go it alone unless CAP went through in 1967. <br /> <br />The legislature's lower house likewise was alerted to the <br />possibility that it would be asked to act on legislation authoriz- <br />ing a go-it-alone project. "We no longer can approach this vital <br />water situation with but one shell in our gun," the House was <br />told by Rep. William D. Lyman (R-Yavapai), chairman of the <br />Committee on Fish, Game and Natural Resources. He said his <br />committee agreed with Governor Williams that "the next two <br />years should see the start of the Central Arizona Project, either <br /> <br />I <br />t <br /> <br />-39- <br />