My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02505
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:18 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:09:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/20/1984
Author
PSIAC
Title
Minutes of the 84-1 Meeting - September 20-21 1984
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />003349 <br /> <br />Benchmark 11 -' Maximum Water Yield Level <br /> <br />Arapaho/Roosevelt FEIS <br /> <br />The maximum potential for water yield for the Forest within water <br />quality standards is 2.21 million acre-feet per year. compared to the <br />current level of 1. 97 million acre-feet. The maximum potential was <br />estimated from the maximum allowable yield calculations for each <br />watershed in the Forest. Activities needed to achieve this maximum <br />potential include clearcuts on deep soil land types at optimum elevations <br />and aspects, the creation of optimally located and sized openin~s in <br />forested areas. and the installation of snow fences in suitable <br />high-elevation locations. <br /> <br />This benchmark was based on the followin!\,: <br /> <br />o Wilderness limits the acreage that is available for vegetation <br />treatment; <br /> <br />o One out of every two forested acres would be maintained in a <br />clcarcut condition; <br /> <br />o Many conflicts with other resources. such as wildlife. recreation <br />downhill skiing opportunities. and aesthetics would exist; <br /> <br />o Loggin!\, on steep or unstable (high cost) forested slopes would be <br /> <br />necessary; <br /> <br />o Access would be developed into previously unroaded watersheds; <br />and <br /> <br />o Budget constraints do not limit snow fence construction. <br /> <br />~ ,') \ <br /> <br />!l. ,~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.