Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />r. f1l ~ ,< '7 I <br />.' '~ ~. 0", lQ <br />~. j '. v ... <br /> <br />December 18, 1992 <br />Issue No. 970 <br /> <br />WESTERN <br />STATES WATER <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />TIIE WEEKLY NEWSLElTER OF TIIE WESlERN STAlES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />editor - Tony Willardson <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suite A-201 I 942 East 7145 So. I Midvale, Utah 84047 I (801) 561-5300 I FAX (801) 255-9642 <br /> <br />typist - Carrie Curvin <br /> <br />ENVlRONMENT/WESTERN GOVERNORS <br />Endangered Species Act/WGA <br /> <br />At ~s recent mid-winter meeting the Western <br />Governors' Association (WGA) adopted a resolution <br />recommending reauthorization of the Endangered <br />Species Act (ESA) and only amendments necessary <br />to make the Act 'more understandable and workable.' <br />. The Governors stated that the roles, responsibil~ies <br />and incentives provided the states and stakeholders <br />to help in the recovery of threatened and endangered <br />species must be signilicantly enhanced and that the <br />Act should require state and stakeholder notilication <br />and any opportun~ to comment prior to any agency <br />decision. 'Congress should ensure that states are <br />partners in establishing and implementing recovery <br />plans, developing habitat evaluations, and mon~oring <br />and managing species while listed,' the WGA said. <br /> <br />The resolution agrees that the listing of threatened <br />and endangered species should continue to be <br />based solely on the best scientilic data available, and <br />recommends that amendments address the backlog <br />of species that are candidates for listing and provide <br />needed fleXibility in meeting deadlines. Further, the <br />Act should be amended to authorize agencies to list <br />species as clusters, where appropriate, and designate <br />critical habitat and development of recovery plans for <br />clusters or related groups. Designation of critical <br />habitat and the development of recovery plans should <br />occur concurrently, w~hin a specified period of time <br />after a species or cluster has been listed. <br /> <br />. The resolution also Ilrges Congress to direct <br />agencies to respect the current distinctions between <br />endangered and threatened species and provide <br />greater f1exibil~ in managing threatened species. <br />While agreeing that 'regulated' takings by government <br />agencies are appropriately limited to extraordinary <br /> <br />chairman - Dave Kennedy <br /> <br />executive director - Craig Bell <br /> <br />cases, the definition of an extraordinary case is too <br />rigid and should be modilied to allow greater flexibil~ <br />to decide when regulated takings are appropriate. <br />The resolution notes that the de-listing of species has <br />proceeded at 'a glacial pace,' and recommends that <br />the Act mandate relevant agencies specify in recovery <br />plans quantiliable objectives that, if met, would require <br />the agencies to start the de-listing process. <br /> <br />While recognizing that economic impacts are <br />considered in designating critical hab~at and adopting <br />recovery plans, the WGA states such impacts are a <br />resu~ of the national prior~ placed on species <br />survival, and should be m~igated through federally <br />funded measures. Finally, the WGA resolution urges <br />Congress to substantially increase funding and <br />adequately support federal agencies responsible for <br />implementing the Act, and also states, local <br />governments and private concerns dealing with the <br />recovery of threatened and endangered species. <br /> <br />WATER aUALlTY/WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />CaJifornia/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta <br /> <br />A long-awaited set of proposed rules to protect <br />the habitat of fish species in the Sacramento-San <br />Joaquin De~a was released by the California State <br />Water Resources Control Board on December 10. <br />EPA has pressured the state to complete interim <br />standards to protect the De~a while a long-term <br />solution is developed. The rules could significantly <br />affect future water deliveries to many California users <br />over a 5-year period, while the state stlldies and <br />implements a long-term protection plan. Overall water <br />exports from the De~a will be diminished by an <br />average of 800,000 acre-feet per year. In dry years, <br />deliveries from the State Water Project and the federal <br />Central Valley Project could be reduced by nearly 2M <br />acre-feet. Reductions would be approximately one- <br />