Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />0016S r <br /> <br />August 21, 1992 <br />Issue No, 953 <br /> <br /> <br />WESTERN <br />STATES WATER <br /> <br />THE WEEKLY NEWSLETIER OF THE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />editor - Tony Willardson <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suite 11.-201 I 942 East 7145 So. I Midvale, Utah 84047 I (801) 561-5300 I FAX (801) 255-9642 <br /> <br />typist - carrie Curvin <br /> <br />CONGRESSIONAl UPDATE <br /> <br />Water ResourceslEnergy <br />The Congress has adjourned for its August recess, <br />When it returns after Labor Day, important water <br />related bills will be waiting for action. The Senate has <br />passed and returned to the House, insisting on its <br />amendments, the FY93 energy and water <br />~ development bill (H.R. 5373). Senate Conferees were <br />... named on August 3 0NSW #952). <br /> <br />The House and Senate must also agree in <br />conference on changes to H,R. 776, the National <br />Energy Policy Act 0NSW #951). The bill includes <br />important water related provisions on federal <br />hydropower licensing, state protected rivers, water <br />efficient plumbing fixtures, and fishways, With respect <br />to the latter, Senate minority staff have expressed <br />concern that the House bill gives the U.S, Fish and <br />Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries <br />Service complete discretion 'to prescribe fish passage <br />downstream and upstream...for any migratory or non- <br />migratory fish,' This could be construed to include <br />flows as well as facilities. Further, Senate staff may <br />try to expand the intent of the 'Miller amendments' to <br />require FERC to comply with any comprehensive state <br />plans for any waterway, under Section 10(a), and not <br />just state protected recreational rivers. Considerable <br />disagreement remains over many energy provisions, <br />House and Senate staff have met often since the bill <br />was passed to work out differences. The fate of the <br />bill may depend on the conference result, as the <br />Bush Administration has threatened to veto the House <br />passed bill. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Substantial uncertainty also remains over the fate <br />of the omnibus Reclamation package (H,R. 429), <br />House and Senate staff have met and identified over <br />a dozen different issues that need to be resolved, <br />though many provisions of both bills are identical, <br /> <br />chairman - Dave Kennedy <br /> <br />executive director - Craig Bell <br /> <br />including reauthorization of the Central Utah Project. <br />The key issues involve the Central Valley Project and <br />Reclamation farm subsidies. Rep, George Miller (D- <br />CA), and Senators Bill Bradley (D-NJ) and Jay <br />Bennett Johnston (D-LA) have proposed major <br />changes opposed by farmers (see WSW #951). <br />Senator Johnston, who will co-chair the conference, <br />has decided not to meet wnh House conferees until <br />after the August recess. Earlier this year, President <br />Bush promised CVP farmers he would veto any Miller- <br />Bradley bill. <br /> <br />On August 6, the House Public Works and <br />Transportation Committee, chaired by Rep. Robert <br />Roe (D-NJ), reported a $3,16B omnibus Corps of <br />Engineers water project authorization bill (H.R. 5754). <br />However, other House committees have asked for <br />referral. The Administration reportedly opposes the <br />bill because it varies from the 1986 cost sharing <br />principles, and authorizes projects that have not <br />completed the Corps review process. Of note, the <br />Committee dropped a $689M au1horization for a flood <br />control project on the American River above <br />Sacramento, the Auburn Dam. Companion legislation <br />has been introduced in the Senate (S, 2500). <br /> <br />WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />Drought/Water Supply Outlook <br />According to the August 15 Palmer Drought Index, <br />severe to extreme drought condnions persist in the <br />Columbia River Basin of the Pacific Northwest, <br />including most of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, <br />northern Nevada, the northern two-thirds of California, <br />most of Utah, western Colorado, northeast and <br />southwest Wyoming, and central North Dakota. <br />Moderate to severe drought condnions exist in <br />southern California, northern Nevada, most of <br />Montana, most of Kansas, some portions of Oklahoma <br />and Nebraska, and other isolated areas. In general, <br />