|
<br />
<br />0016S r
<br />
<br />August 21, 1992
<br />Issue No, 953
<br />
<br />
<br />WESTERN
<br />STATES WATER
<br />
<br />THE WEEKLY NEWSLETIER OF THE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL
<br />
<br />editor - Tony Willardson
<br />
<br />Creekview Plaza, Suite 11.-201 I 942 East 7145 So. I Midvale, Utah 84047 I (801) 561-5300 I FAX (801) 255-9642
<br />
<br />typist - carrie Curvin
<br />
<br />CONGRESSIONAl UPDATE
<br />
<br />Water ResourceslEnergy
<br />The Congress has adjourned for its August recess,
<br />When it returns after Labor Day, important water
<br />related bills will be waiting for action. The Senate has
<br />passed and returned to the House, insisting on its
<br />amendments, the FY93 energy and water
<br />~ development bill (H.R. 5373). Senate Conferees were
<br />... named on August 3 0NSW #952).
<br />
<br />The House and Senate must also agree in
<br />conference on changes to H,R. 776, the National
<br />Energy Policy Act 0NSW #951). The bill includes
<br />important water related provisions on federal
<br />hydropower licensing, state protected rivers, water
<br />efficient plumbing fixtures, and fishways, With respect
<br />to the latter, Senate minority staff have expressed
<br />concern that the House bill gives the U.S, Fish and
<br />Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries
<br />Service complete discretion 'to prescribe fish passage
<br />downstream and upstream...for any migratory or non-
<br />migratory fish,' This could be construed to include
<br />flows as well as facilities. Further, Senate staff may
<br />try to expand the intent of the 'Miller amendments' to
<br />require FERC to comply with any comprehensive state
<br />plans for any waterway, under Section 10(a), and not
<br />just state protected recreational rivers. Considerable
<br />disagreement remains over many energy provisions,
<br />House and Senate staff have met often since the bill
<br />was passed to work out differences. The fate of the
<br />bill may depend on the conference result, as the
<br />Bush Administration has threatened to veto the House
<br />passed bill.
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />Substantial uncertainty also remains over the fate
<br />of the omnibus Reclamation package (H,R. 429),
<br />House and Senate staff have met and identified over
<br />a dozen different issues that need to be resolved,
<br />though many provisions of both bills are identical,
<br />
<br />chairman - Dave Kennedy
<br />
<br />executive director - Craig Bell
<br />
<br />including reauthorization of the Central Utah Project.
<br />The key issues involve the Central Valley Project and
<br />Reclamation farm subsidies. Rep, George Miller (D-
<br />CA), and Senators Bill Bradley (D-NJ) and Jay
<br />Bennett Johnston (D-LA) have proposed major
<br />changes opposed by farmers (see WSW #951).
<br />Senator Johnston, who will co-chair the conference,
<br />has decided not to meet wnh House conferees until
<br />after the August recess. Earlier this year, President
<br />Bush promised CVP farmers he would veto any Miller-
<br />Bradley bill.
<br />
<br />On August 6, the House Public Works and
<br />Transportation Committee, chaired by Rep. Robert
<br />Roe (D-NJ), reported a $3,16B omnibus Corps of
<br />Engineers water project authorization bill (H.R. 5754).
<br />However, other House committees have asked for
<br />referral. The Administration reportedly opposes the
<br />bill because it varies from the 1986 cost sharing
<br />principles, and authorizes projects that have not
<br />completed the Corps review process. Of note, the
<br />Committee dropped a $689M au1horization for a flood
<br />control project on the American River above
<br />Sacramento, the Auburn Dam. Companion legislation
<br />has been introduced in the Senate (S, 2500).
<br />
<br />WATER RESOURCES
<br />
<br />Drought/Water Supply Outlook
<br />According to the August 15 Palmer Drought Index,
<br />severe to extreme drought condnions persist in the
<br />Columbia River Basin of the Pacific Northwest,
<br />including most of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho,
<br />northern Nevada, the northern two-thirds of California,
<br />most of Utah, western Colorado, northeast and
<br />southwest Wyoming, and central North Dakota.
<br />Moderate to severe drought condnions exist in
<br />southern California, northern Nevada, most of
<br />Montana, most of Kansas, some portions of Oklahoma
<br />and Nebraska, and other isolated areas. In general,
<br />
|