Laserfiche WebLink
<br />disagreement on the nature, location, and timing of development on Burnt <br />Mountain. <br /> <br />The WRNF received 1,842 responses on the DEIS during the GO-day public comment <br />period. The following table compares the percentage of responses based upon the <br />respondent's position toward ASC' s proposed action, The percentages of responses <br />received via form or modified form letters are provided for those responses in <br />support or in opposition to the proposed development, <br /> <br />Table 1: Summal1' of DEIS Responses <br /> <br />Cornmon Codine: <br /> <br />% of Total <br /> <br />. Responses in -support of proposed development <br />(65%1 of these were via form or modified fonn letters) <br /> <br />71 <br /> <br />. Responses expressing conditional support for the <br />proposed developmenr- <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />. Responses opposed to Burnt Mt, expansion3 <br />(18%4 of these were via fonn or modified form letters) <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />. No opinion <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />. Responses commenting on propo'sed accelerated actions only <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />TOTAL <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />Percentage of responses in support, not total responses. <br />Generally in support based upon successful mitigation, modification of certain MOP components, <br />or other action. <br />Very few responses were opposed to upgrading of existing facilities. <br />Percentage of responses in opposition. not total responses. <br /> <br />D. RELATED PERMITS, PLANS AND ACTIONS <br /> <br />There are many federal, state, and local laws and regulations which affect <br />development and operation of the Snowmass Ski Area. ASC is required by its <br />Special Use Permit to comply with all present and future state and local laws, <br />ordinances or regulations which are applicable to the area or its operations, to <br />the extent that they are not in conflict with federal law or policy. The Forest <br />Service assumes no responsibility for enforcing laws, regulations or ordinances <br />which are under the jurisdiction of other governmental bodies, Npr is the agency <br />bound by the actions ,of the TOSV or Pitkin County in reviewing/approving proposed <br />development on NFSL. <br /> <br />Impacts to the waters of the U.S., including wetlands, are regulated by the U.S. <br />Army Corps of Engineers (COE). COE has indicated that a single Section 404 <br />permit, rather than separate permits, for the discharge of dredged or fill <br />materials into waters of the U,S" including wetlands, will be required for both <br />development on NFSL and for connected actions occurring on private land, <br />including the East Village lift, parking lot and trails, A Seotion 401 Water <br />Quality certification from the Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality <br />Control Division, would be required in conjunction with Section 404 permits <br />obtained from COE. <br /> <br />Construction activities on NFSL, including clearing, grading, excavation and <br />other ground disturbance activities, will require Construction Stormwater <br /> <br />Summary,. 4 <br />