Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />~ <br />~ <br />1 <br /> <br />42 <br /> <br />another 10 percent during the remainder of the decade. Oil consumption is <br />projected to remain relatively constant throughout the decade. Additional <br />delays in the startup of the Diablo Canyon and San Onofre nuclear units <br />would seriously affect the near term natural gas and oil consumption <br />projections and significant delays in the Palo Verde, Allen and <br />Intermountain units could seriously affect the long term gas and oil <br />cDnsumption projections. <br /> <br />The availability of natural gas from existing sources is <br />significantly greater than projected two years ago but is expected to <br />decline during the next ten years. Several California utilities are <br />projecting the use of new sources in the estimates of gas availability. <br />The new sources which are under development, primarily liquefied natural <br />gas and gas from Alaska, are expected to be able to provide additional <br />quantities of gas starting in 1985-1986. If the development of these new <br />gas sources is delayed, additional quantities of fuel oil above those <br />which are now projected may be required. Current estimates for the WSCC <br />region indicate that gas consumption in 1991 will be 487,842 million cubic <br />feet, which represents 60 percent of the gas used for electric generation <br />in 1981. <br /> <br />Table 39 provides a complete SUnlmary of projected oil <br />requirements by area for each of the four areas and compares the <br />requirements for median and adverse hydro conditions. Oil requirements <br />will increase under adverse hydro conditions from 8 percent to 13 percent <br />over those for median hydro conditions. This fact was clearly <br />demonstrated during the 1977 drought when the actual oil requirement <br />increased by 30 percent over the 1976 requirement due to adverse hydro <br />conditions. A comparison of the actual 1981 energy sources for the U.S. <br />systems of the WSCC region with the actual 1976 through 1980 energy <br />sources is presented as follows: <br /> <br />WSCC - U.S. SYSTEMS <br />SOURCES OF ELECTRIC ENERGY GENERATION - PERCENT <br />ACTUAL HYDRO CONDITIONS <br /> <br />Source 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 <br />~ro 50 35 46 40 43 42 <br />Coal 19 25 23 25 27 28 <br />Oil 17 22 16 16 10 6 <br />Gas 11 12 11 14 15 18 <br />Nuclear 2 5 3 4 3 3 <br />Geothermal 1 1 1 1 1 1 <br /> During 1981, net exports from the region's largest exporter, the <br />U.S. portion of the Northwest Power Pool Area, were 21,808 GWH, nearly <br />double the 1980 export of 11,740 GWH and 8 percent above the 1979 export. <br />The export from the NWPP (including Canada) to CA-NV was 29,580 GWH (48.3 <br />million equivalent barrels of oil) up from 10,742 GWH in 1980. <br /> <br />Oil-burn requirements for the total WSCC area were 45,595 <br />thousand barrels in 1981 which represents 67.6 percent of 1980's oil-burn <br />requirement of 67,444 thousand barrels and 38.3 percent of 1979's <br />