My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02427
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02427
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:36:46 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:06:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
6/1/1999
Author
BOR
Title
Animas-La Plata Project (Newsletters Vol. 1/2/4/5)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ing projects and/or delivery systems. The two <br />,elements would be used in combination, <br />through the free market system, to provide the <br />necessary water to satisfy the Ute Indian Tribes' <br />water rights claims. <br /> <br />Alternative #7: <br />1996 Final Supplement to the Final Environmental <br />Statement Recommended Action - This alternative, <br />as documented in the 1996 Final Supplement to <br />the Final Environmental Statement, recom- <br />mends diverting flows of the AnImas, La Plata, <br />and San Juan Rivers for irrigation, municipal, <br />and industrial needs. It would also provide for <br />fish and wildlife preservation, recreation facili- <br />ties, and a cultural resources program. The rec- <br />ommended action called for constructing the <br />ALP'in two phases, providing for a total deple- <br />tion of 149,220 af per year. Major facilities <br />would include the Durango and Ridges Basin <br />pumping plants, Ridges Basin inlet conduit, <br />Ridges Basin and Southern Ute re~ervoirs, La <br />Plata and Southern Ute diversion dams, and <br />various canals and laterals. <br /> <br />A1te~native #8: <br />Administration Proposal with an Alternative Water <br />Supply Jar Non-Ute Entities - This alternative <br />would supply M&I water to non-Ute entities <br />(i.e., Animas - La Plata Water Conservancy Dis- <br />trict, San Juan Water Commission, and Navajo <br />Nation) from sources other than the proposed <br />Ridges Basin Reservoir. Potential alternative <br />water sources include savings from water conser- <br /> <br />vation, use of existing Federal facilities, and con- <br />struction of a separate reservoir. <br /> <br />Alternative #9: <br />Citizens Progressive Alliance Proposal - This <br />alternative would allow the Colorado Ute Tribes <br />to lease water instream based on the water <br />amounts specificed in the 1986 Settlement <br />Agreement. The economic value of such <br />instream leasing would be calculated based on <br />leaving Animas River water instream and subse- <br />quent effects on hydropower production and <br />lower levels of salinity. This instream leasing <br />w~uld provide a revenue stream to the two Col- <br />orado Ute Tribes to use to acquire water from <br />existing projects and uses to meet their future <br />water needs. <br /> <br />Alternative #10: <br />No Action Alternative - Under this alternative, <br />there would be no additional activities under- <br />taken at this time to implement the Colorado <br />Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement Act, and as a <br />consequence, there would be no settlement of <br />the Tribes' senior water right claims. The Tribes, <br />as outlined in the 1986 Settlement Act, must <br />elect to either retain the project reserved water <br />right or they must commence litigation or <br />negotiation of their pending reserved water <br />rights claims. <br /> <br />NEPA Process Underway continued from page 1 <br /> <br />existing facilities, direct flow rights, or substitute <br />financial benefits to satisfy their water rights claims. <br />Public scoping meetings were held in February <br />1999. Following review of the input received at <br />those meetings and discussions with agency repre- <br />sentatives, two additional alternatives (both varia- <br />tIOns of the AdministratIOn Proposal) were added <br />to the list of alternatives to be evaluated. A SUill- <br /> <br />mary description of each of the ten alternatives is <br />provided in this newsletter. Three of these alterna- <br />tives were a direct result of a process initiated by <br />former Colorado Gov~rnor Roy Romer and Lt. <br />Governor Gail Schoettler in 1996 to seek resolu- <br />tion of issues associated with the proposal <br />described in the 1996 FSFES. <br /> <br />New On-Line: <br />Animas-La Plata <br />Website <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation, <br />Upper Colorado Region, has <br />recently added a new element to <br />its webpage which provides infor- <br />mation on the Animas la-Plata <br />Project. <br />The new site is an excellent <br />source of information about the <br />project and the environmental <br />review process currently underway. <br />For those persons who have <br />access to the Internet, we <br />encourage you to visit our web- <br />page and view the information it <br />contains. You will find several <br />articles that provide background <br />information, descriptions of the <br />alternatives being analyzed, a <br />project schedule/timeline, and a <br />site map. The first issue of the <br />ALP newsletter (published in <br />June 1999) is also available on <br />the website. <br />You can reach the ALP web <br />page through the following ud: <br />http://www.uc.usbr.gov. <br /> <br />3 <br />- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.