Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~~~~~~~~AAAAA~.AA. <br />""-\ ~ <br /> <br />\ Ii Ani~as-La Plata Project <br /> <br />~ . . <br />Volume 1 U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation June 1999 <br /> <br />TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT <br /> <br />About this <br />Newsletter <br /> <br />This is the first in a series <br />of six newsletters designed <br />to bring you up-to-date <br />information on the <br />environmental review <br />process for final implemen- <br />tation of the Colorado Ute <br />Water Rights Settlement. <br />Our goal is to keep you <br />informed of: <br /> <br />Key events about the <br />EIS process <br /> <br />Status ofEIS process <br />milestones <br /> <br />. Upcoming dates for <br />release of documents <br />for public review and <br />comment <br /> <br />Results of public review <br />and comment process <br /> <br />future editions of the <br />newsletter will be published <br />at approximately 3-month <br />intervals. Look for the next <br />issue in August 1999. <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />JUN 2 1 1999 <br /> <br />C~OI<:-,~ <br />ConS&lV'dUU{! L......,. <br /> <br />Supplemental EIS Being Prepared <br /> <br /> <br />In January 1999, the U.S. Bureau of Recla- <br />mation announced its intention to prepare a <br />Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact <br />Statement (DSEIS) for the Animas-La Plata <br />Project (ALP) pursuant to the National Environ- <br />mental Policy Act ~EPA) <br />In compliance with NEPA, the DSEIS will <br />examine several alternatives, including struc- <br />tural and nonstructural options to meet the <br /> <br />conditions ofthe 1988 Colorado Ute Indian <br />Water Rights Settlement Act. The Bureau of <br />Reclamation intends to evaluate the direct and <br />indirect impacts the Administration Proposal <br />and alternatives may have o,n the affected envi- <br />ronment. including: <br />. impacts to aquatic resources (to include <br />wetlands identification/mitigation) <br />. water quality <br /> <br />continued on page. 3 <br /> <br />February 1999 Scoping Meetings <br /> <br />1 : <br />---' <br /> <br />Scoping meetings were held in February 1999 <br />to obtain input, questions and concerns, and sug- <br />gestions from the pubhc. The first meeting was <br />held on February 2 in Durango, Colorado. with <br />approximately 275 attendees. Approximately 100 <br />, individuals attended the second meeting. held in <br />Famlington. New Mexico on February 3. The final <br />meeting was held on February 4 in Denver. Col- <br />orado. Appro"fmately 50 persons attended that <br />meeting. Some of the major issues presented dur- <br />ing the meetings included: <br />. the need to honor commitments and <br />promises made to the Colorado Ute Tribes <br />in the 1988 Settlement Act <br />. use of existing facilities to settle the tribal <br />water rights claims <br />. elimination of irrigation features/providing a <br />project irrigation component <br />. how and where the water would be used in <br />the absence of irrigation and certain munici- <br />pal and industrial (Mu!) facihties <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Scoping meeting participants review project information <br /> <br />. the best location for the reservoir site given <br />the projects reduced size and scope <br />. ensuring that there will be enough Sanjuan <br />River Basin water to address future growth and <br />economic development for the Navajo Nation <br />The Bureau of Reclamation is evaluating <br />public and agency input obtained during the <br />scoping process. Potential new or modified <br />alternatives may be developed which will be <br />included in the alternatives evaluation phase of <br />the NEPA process. <br />