Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,:::> <br />CX" <br />~ <br /> <br />COlORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />813 State Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver. Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 86&3441 <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORI\DO <br />- <br /> <br />Richard D. lamm <br />Governor <br /> <br />,'- <br />- <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN DUM <br /> <br />J. William McDonald <br />Director <br />D4IIvid W. Walker <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />TO: Members, CWCB <br /> <br />FROM: Bill McDonald <br /> <br />DATE March 26, 1982 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item 9, April 1, 1982, Board Meeting-- <br />Meetinq--Dominguez Reservoir <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />As you will recall, the Board .reviewed this proposed project <br />at its February meetina (see my January 28 memo for details). I <br />subsequently informed the Bureau of Reclamation of the Board's <br />position in a letter dated February 22 to Cliff Barnett, the <br />Reaional Director (copy attached). <br /> <br />Mr. Barrett, in a letter d.ated March 5 (copy attached), has <br />responded. His letter expresses concern about proceeding with a <br />feasibility study of the M&I formulation of the project. This <br />matter is brought to your attention in order that you might <br />consider whether a response to Mr. Barrett is in order. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Barrett's March 5 letter raises two main issues: (1) <br />whether commitments for the 221,200 acre-foot annual yield of the <br />reservoir are likely to be forthcoming, and (2) whether Colorado <br />is prepared to devote such a large increment of its remaining <br />compact entitlement to this project (an estimted 250,900 <br />acre-feet per year including reservoir evaporation). <br /> <br />with respect to the first item, reclamation law does not <br />require that letters of intent or commitments to purchase the <br />water supply of a potential project be forthcoming before the <br />Bureau can proceed to perform a feasibility study. Indeed, such <br />a requirement would be inconsistent with the purposes of <br /> <br />ed <br />ai/9 <br /> <br />Robert A. Jackson, Chairman. John R. Fetcher, Vice Chairman <br />CM. Furneaux. Dale F. Grant, Richard W. Johnston, Jr. Frederick V. Kroeger, David W. Robbins. ~ H. Vandemoer <br />