My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02402
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02402
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:36:35 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:05:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.060
Description
Wild and Scenic - Colorado National Monument
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
5/1/1971
Author
National Park Servic
Title
Wilderness Recommendation - Colorado National Monument - Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />f\ n :: ? .j 6 <br /> <br />DOO1..0\P <br /> <br />.u <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />.,., <br />,. <br />\' <br />L <br /> <br />ii <br />j, <br />,;J <br /> <br />Ti <br />j' <br />..1; <br /> <br />r <br />1. <br />lJ <br /> <br />1] <br /> <br />'n <br />L <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />1i <br />.1J <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />As required by the Wilderness Act, a public. hearing was held on the <br />preliminary wilderness proposal for Colorado National Monument at <br />Grand Junction, Colorado, on November 30. 1970. Notice. of the <br />hearing had appeared in the Federal Register on September 30, 1970, <br />and in local newspapers in Grand Junction, Fruita, Delta, Hotchkiss, <br />Montrose, and Gunnison, Colorado. Eighty.three people attended the <br />hearing, and 20 oral statements were presented. A total of 241 letters <br />were received. <br /> <br />l1 <br />..L: <br /> <br />I~ <br /> <br />11 <br />L <br /> <br />Of the agencies. private organizations. and individuals testifyin9 or <br />submitting written views, eight of the 34 organizations and 48 of the <br />286 individuals supported the preliminary wilderness proposal. Two <br />of the public agencies, 23 of the private organizations, and 228 of <br />the 286 individuals commenting favored a larger wilderness. Two <br />public agencies and nine individuals favored wilderness with no <br />specific recommendations. Two private organizations opposed the <br />establishment of wilderness. Ten public agencies, one private <br />organization, and one individual acknowledged they had received a <br />copy of the wilderness proposal, but had no specific comments to <br />make. <br /> <br />r <br />.1..' <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />I' <br />. <br /> <br />n <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.