Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3500 <br /> <br />CONTENTS <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />Acknowledgments ........,.................,............................... ii <br /> <br />Summary ..................................'...,.......................... 1 <br />Conclusions. . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br />Recommendations .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . , . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br /> <br />Background .,.,...,.,'..,................................................. 3 <br /> <br />Candidate site characteristics ....................,......,................... 4 <br /> <br />Thermal and electric power conversion ...................................... 6 <br />Performance analysis. . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 <br /> <br />Mass balances .....'.................................................... 10 <br />Assumptions .... " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10 <br />Computational procedures ............................................. 12 <br /> <br />Results , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12 <br /> <br />Solar-pond-coupled desalination ............................................ 14 <br /> <br />Reverse osmosis ........................................................ 15 <br />Horizontal-tube. multiple-effect distillation (HTMEDI ,....................... 16 <br />Potential improved desalination technologies .............................. 20 <br />Low-pressure. three-stage RO .....................,................... 20 <br />Multiple-effect, wiped-film evaporator .................................. 20 <br />Other potential improvements...,....... ...' ... .... .................... 21 <br /> <br />Economic analysis ..,..................................,...........,....... 21 <br />Single-purpose applications ..........................,................... 22 <br />Electric power generation only/no desalination.. ...... .................. 22 <br />Desalination only (single purpose) ..............,....................... 25 <br />Multipurpose project .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 27 <br /> <br />Bibliography. .. . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .. 32 <br /> <br />Appendixes <br /> <br />A-Solar pond brine properties and pretreatment options ................... A 1 <br /> <br />B-Solar pond liners. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .. . , . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. B 1 <br />C-SOLPOND input parameters .......................................... C1 <br />D-Sample SOLPOND output..................... ......... ............... D1 <br />E-Single-purpose desalination cost data .................................. E 1 <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />Table <br /> <br />1 Continuous thermal and electric power output at Danby Dry Lake ......... 8 <br />2 Solar pond performance results for Danby and Sevier <br />Dry La~es (comparison between SOLPOND and <br />JPL's computer program) ............,.......,....................... 8 <br />3 Solar pond expansion rates ............................................ 13 <br /> <br />iii <br />