My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02349
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02349
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:36:19 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:04:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449
Description
Platte River Studies
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
3/1/1993
Author
City of Greeley
Title
Peterson Reservoir Dam Hydrology and Hydraulics
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS <br /> <br />Probable Maximum Flood <br />The drainage basin for Peterson Reservoir extends south from the reservoir and encompasses an area of <br />2.7 square miles. The reservoir water surface area is approximately 0.09 square miles. The distance <br />from the basin divide to the reservoir is 2.06 miles and has an average slope of 659 feet per mile. <br /> <br />The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-l computer program was used to compute the Probable <br />Maximum Flood (PMF) and route it through the reservoir and across the spillway. The HEC-l computer <br />printout for the analysis is included in the Appendix. <br /> <br />The soils in the basin are a typical mountainous and forested environment consisting of shallow to deep <br />sand and gravels with some rock outcroppings. The composite "CN" number used by SCS methods for <br />these soils is estimated to be 70. <br /> <br />Precipitation losses from infiltration and interception are accounted for in order to compute the excess <br />rainfall which produces runoff. For a mountainous area, typical loss rates can be represented as a <br />uniform loss of 0.1 inches per hour,' which is in the slow category. Uniform infiltration loss analysis <br />has shown, with experience, to be slightly more accurate than the SCS option and was, therefore, used <br />for the analysis. Basin imperviousness is estimated at a conservative 45 percent to account for rock <br />outcroppings. <br /> <br />Different coefficients of precipitation losses do not vary the results in the PMF significantly due to the <br />large amount of rainfall resulting in direct runoff. For PMF calculations, the minimum loss is carried <br />throughout the stonn. Factors which have a greater effect on the PMF are the procedures for the <br />determination of the unit hydrograpb and basin geometry. <br /> <br />The USBR Dimensionless Unit Hydrograpb Method was used for determination of synthetic hydrographs. <br />Time to peak cr,) values were determined from the Snyder lag equation, T,= c,( L*LjS".')N. For <br />bydrograph calculations, the drainage basin was divided into two areas. The first basin is a 2.6 square <br />mile basin that includes the overland flow area above the reservoir. A dimensionless unit hydrograpb <br />was developed for that area in accordance with the USBR procedures. The second basin is the area of <br />the lake surface (which is 0.09 square miles) for which a unit hydrograph was determined that bas no <br /> <br />'. Flood Hydrology Manual, USBR, 1989 page 112 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.