Laserfiche WebLink
<br />J <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />O~1792 <br /> <br />2. Background <br /> <br />The Upper Arkansas River Basin has been intermittently mined since the mid-1800's. <br />Storage of mine waste on hillslopes, within valley bottoms, and along channels resulted <br />in erosion and transport of metals-laden tailings downstream. Currently, the channel <br />perimeter, channel margin, and floodplain environments of the Arkansas River <br />downstream of California Gulch contain mine derived sediment of variable metals <br />content (URS Operating Services, 1997). Transbasin water diversion facilities have <br />imported flows to the Upper Arkansas River Basin since the early-1900's. The existing <br />channel system has been utilized to convey diverted flows such that the hydrology of the <br />Upper Arkansas River and its tributaries has been altered over the last century, <br />Controlled releases out of Turquoise Reservoir into Lake Fork Creek, coupled with flow <br />conveyance through the Mt. Elbert Conduit have further modified project reach <br />hydrology. Additional activities that have affected the geomorphic evolution of the <br />project reach include livestock grazing, flow diversions, and floodplain irrigation. <br /> <br />2.1. The Upper Arkansas River Restoration Project <br />As stated in the Request for Proposals (RFP), the primary goal of the Upper Arkansas <br />River Restoration Project (UARRP) is the restoration of the II-mile project reach to a <br />healthy ecosystem. To achieve this goal, several restoration objectives have been <br />identified by the UARRP Core Group, including: reduction of riverbank erosion, property <br />loss and channel aggradation/degradation; reduction of the impacts of historic mine waste <br />deposits to the aquatic and riparian system; improvement of the riparian zone by re- <br />establishing healthy, naturally occurring riparian plant communities; improvement of <br />fisheries; and minimization of long-term stream channel and riverbank maintenance. . <br />Although the stated objectives of the UARRP Core Group do not define the specific <br />objectives of this investigation, the UARRP restoration objectives have been considered <br />in the development of process-based rehabilitation strategies. <br /> <br />2.2. Project Goals and Objectives <br /> <br />This investigation has been conducted as one component of the Upper Arkansas River <br />Restoration Project. The primary goal ofthis investigation is a geomorphic assessment of <br />the II-miles of channel and its floodplain from California Gulch to the mouth of Box <br />Creek. The two main components of the geomorphic assessment include the <br />characterization of the geomorphic history of the project reach, and the assessment of <br />current channel stability, The geomorphic evolution of the reach provides insight as to <br />the physical influences that have driven channel adjustments, and the channel stability <br />assessment describes the current state of those adjustments. <br /> <br />The geomorphic assessment has been utilized to estimate the relative potential for tailings <br />entrainment on a subreach basis. From this direct integration of geomorphic process and <br />general tailings distributions, conceptual means of reducing that potential have been <br />developed. This assessment does not address the relative threat posed by individual <br />tailings deposits, which can be variable due to the range of metals concentrations present, <br />but is based on general entrainment potential of identified deposits. Furthermore, while <br /> <br />May 7, 1999 <br /> <br />Fluvial Geomorphological Assessment <br />Upper Arkansas River <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />