Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Notes: <br />1. Table 3-10, p. 3-12. <br />2. Table 6-3, p. 6-7. <br />3. P. 5-19. Modelled as senior by virtue of 65,000 af general subordination. 5-19. <br />4. Table 6-3,p.6-7. Modelled as iiieniorapparently by vi-rtueet aU9JDentation relea5es <br />frbiil5tagecoach, see p.""2--12'.'"' <br />110,444 af 1989 actual demands minus 31,335 af explicitly modelled existing junior <br />demands. <br />Table 6-3, p. 6-7. <br />compare 121,172 af 1989 maximum demand in Table 3-10, p. 3-12. <br />38,302 af total new demands minus 2,569 af senior new demands (Hayden power). <br />Table 6-3, p. 6-7. <br />1989 maximum to 2040 demand increment, Table 5-4, p. 5-17. <br />1,135,000 af flow at Maybell minus 808,000 af adjusted JCM draft. <br />1,135,000 af minus 162,918 af total existing and new demands. <br />P. 2-2. <br />P. 7-7. <br />Interim Flow Recommendations (March 5, 1990), Appendix I, Table 1. <br />stagecoach Biological Opinion (Aug. 15, 1986), Table 1. <br />Memo from Brendecke to Tenney re: More Modelling Assumptions (July 29, 1991). <br />P. 5-2. <br />stagecoach Biological Opinion, Table 2. Elkhead evaporation only. 2,927 af of <br />consumption at Craig Units eliminated as double count, see Interim Flow <br />Recommendations, Appendix I, Table 1. ' <br />,19. stagecoach BiOlogical Opinion, Table 2. <br />20. stagecoach BiOlogical Opinion, Table 1. 12,873 af total depletions minus 2,400 af for <br />Yamcolo agricultural exchange broken out above., <br />stagecoach Biological Opinion, Table 2. <br />,Compare discussion on pp. 5-4 & 5 and Table 5-1. <br />Memo from Brendecke to Tenney re: Use of Juniper Subordination (March 20, 1992). <br />36,663 af total junior depletions minus sum of depletions for all explicitly listed <br />juniors, see p. 5-21. <br />25. Pp. 2-12 & 13. <br />26. 862,000 unadjusted JCM draft minus 808,000 adjusted draft. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />10. <br />II. <br />11a. <br />12. <br />13. <br />14. <br />15. <br />-16. <br />17. <br />18. <br /> <br />2l. <br />22. <br />23. <br />24. <br /> <br />N:\uc\yampasum <br /> <br />f9BB.;O <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF WATER DEMANDS AND SUBORDINATIONS - YAMPA ALTERNATIVE RESERVOIR STUDY: PHASE I <br />