|
<br />0'-'']'"''
<br />u(...(;C;
<br />
<br />7
<br />
<br />, North Dakota:" ,
<br />(FC) Buford-Trenton Irrigation District and vicinity _. ___ _ ____
<br />Oregon: "..
<br />(N) Columbia Rivet,'below Vancouver, Wash., and the Dalles
<br />, (channeHo Mayer State Park launching ramp) _ c __ __ . __ _ _ _ _ __
<br />, Pennsylvania,:
<br />(N) Delaware :River Channel Dimensions, I'hiladelphia to the
<br />Sea, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware_n___ ___. __ ____
<br />(N) Delaware ,River drift removal, I'ennsylvania, New Jersey
<br />and Delaware_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ c _ _ _ c _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
<br />South Carolina:' - ,
<br />(N) ChafiestonHa'rbor ___. _ _ _ _ _ _ .'.: ,.:: _ _ _ _ _.: _ c. _'_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
<br />-, (N) GeorgetownHarbor______c':__:c___________~.______c-----
<br />Texas: ' ,
<br />(N) Sabine~NecIies Waterw:ay___. _ __ _ _ ____ __ ~_ __ _ c' _ __ _ _ _ _ __
<br />Virginia; ,
<br />,(N). Norfolk Harbor and channels~________ ___. __ _______ _ _. ___
<br />Washington:' ",' .. "
<br />(Nt Columbia, River and Tributaries, McNary Dam to We-
<br />natchee_ _.. __ _ :_--- ___. __ ______~______c_. ____. __,_. _____
<br />WestVirginia: '
<br />(FC) '" Gauley ,RiveL~__- _ _.. _ _c __._--- c _. ____ _ _ _. _ _,' __ _ _ _ _ _ __
<br />1 In~rease in, Hou~e bilJ :Il~4re.
<br />
<br />, ,;: '::CONSTRUCTION" GEN;J!JRAL
<br />,,-
<br />
<br />-~:,;~.~~.~
<br />
<br />~- ..:.; .!-",
<br />~.<; -
<br />
<br />1 10, 000
<br />
<br />5,000
<br />
<br />1 10, 000
<br />
<br />10, 000
<br />
<br />1 80, 000
<br />1 25, 000
<br />
<br />20, 000
<br />
<br />1 10, 000
<br />
<br />30,000
<br />1 25, 000
<br />
<br />Amendment No.5: Appropriates $927,926,000 instead of
<br />'$889,088,000 as proposed by ,the House' and $931,118,000 as pro-
<br />posed by the Senate. ,The managers have given priority to the provi8ion
<br />of mOre adljquaite funding of Proj~C't~ under cons~:i:uction and have
<br />adhered to ivery restrictive poJicyinthe prov1.sioitfor new construc-
<br />tiQn starts. The appropriation includes a total of only $12,3 million to
<br />.iriitiate com;~ruction on only 22 pr9jectswith ll,nes~mated total cost
<br />of $252.3 million. This compares with 24 projects to be completed
<br />during fiscal year 1972 with a total estimated cost of $~68.8 million.
<br />The funds appropriatedund~r this heading are to be allocated as
<br />shown in the following tabulation:
<br />
<br />'.
<br />
<br />:[~,,~.;i',~l,~,f,~,[j~:~~~
<br />
<br />
<br />:~~~:".~, .>->."- -' .:~~...::.:::'~-~:
<br />. ," ."---.-.::~;/:~~:;-.:( ><:.t'
<br />:~':;::';"(-:";,:. .:-:-:-~ .:-- :.-, '.....':.. .~.- .
<br />
<br />:;. "0",
<br />-. '.~: .
<br />
<br />" "
<br />
|