My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02307
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02307
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:36:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:02:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.200
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations -- Colorado River Management Plan
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1981
Author
National Park Serv
Title
Draft Alternatives for the Colorado River Management Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />----pjanning Issues/Background' <br /> <br />C:~ <br />c) <br />i'\) <br />to <br />N <br />'"'" <br /> <br /> <br />If it is the aesthetic aspect of this landscape <br />that stirs human imagination, it was the economic <br />potential of the Colorado in an arid region that <br />interested developers. In 1935 Hoover Dam was <br />completed at the lower end of Grand Canyon and 28 <br />years later, in 1963, Glen Canyon Dam controlled the <br />river's flow at the head of the canyon. <br />Both of these projects were to have an <br />impact on river running through the Grand Canyon. <br />Lake Mead, formed by Hoover Dam, extended into the <br />lower section of the canyon, producing slack water <br />that marked the end of the free-flowing Colorado. <br />Glen Canyon Dam's effects have been more dynamic. <br />The amount of sediment and driftwood that was <br />formerly carried naturally along the river's course <br />through the canyon has been significantly reduced. <br />Water releases from Glen Canyon Dam (its primary I <br />function is to generate hydroelectric power) have <br />created more predictable seasonal water levels but <br />have resulted ia extreme daily fluctuations. <br />Canyon beaches, which provide campsites for river <br />runners, no longer receive sediment and are being <br />eroded. Previoos heavy spring runoffs no longer <br />scour the Colorado's banks, and a new ecosystem has <br />grown up in the pre-dam flood zone. <br />There are other influences that could affect <br />river management in the future that are outside <br />the scope of this plauning effort. For example, <br />the Water and power Resources Service is presently <br />studying the possibility of converting Glen Canyon <br />Dam to a peaking power facility. This conversion <br />would result in even greater fluctuations in daily <br />water flow than now occur. The sharp fluctuations, <br />particularly periods of very low flows, would make <br />river running with large rafts or wooden boats ex- <br />tremely difficult, if not impossible. <br />The desire of the American public to exper- <br />ience this unique part of their natural heritage has <br />dramatically increased. <br />In 1967, 2,100 people made the river trip. The <br />number had jumped to 16,500 in 1972. This :sudden <br />rise in use was noticeably impacting the vulnerable <br />inner canyon ecosystem. <br />Trash, charcoal, and human waste were accumu- <br />lating, multiple trails were developing to points of <br />interest, and the numerous prehistoric and historic <br />sites near the river were being damaged. <br />In 1973, the National Park Service (NPS) <br />initiated a research program and planning process <br />leading to the development of the Colorado River <br />Management Plan in 1979. One major feature of this <br />1979 plan was the phasing out of motorized craft <br />over a five year period. <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.