Laserfiche WebLink
<br />U02593 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />my observation that all of the federal and non-federal LCR MSCP participants are fully <br />committed to completing the LCR MSCP process and submitting the documents to the <br />USFWS for its review and issuance of the ESA Section 7 federal incidental take <br />statement (ITS) and the Section 10 non-federal incidental take authorization (ITA). <br /> <br />Finally, it is the intent that, through the LCR MSCP and the issuance of the non- <br />federal incidental take authorization, all of California's diversion and return of its basic <br />mainstream apportionment of 4,4 million acre-feet (mat) and any lawful surpluses be <br />fully covered under the terms of the IT A, Much of the California apportionment would <br />be covered under the IT A issued to one or more of the large water and power contractors <br />in California, However, there are a number of Present Perfected Rights (PPRs) holders, <br />the water uses under the Lower Colorado Water Supply Project, and so forth, that may <br />not be directly covered under one of the large California agency's ITA. Consequently, it <br />is my recommendation that the Board be an applicant, on behalf of the small water users <br />in California, on the HCP Permit Application and receive an ITA covering those <br />miscellaneous PPRs and other authorized California mainstream water uses, lbis will <br />ensure that all of California's Colorado River allocations and entitlements are fully <br />covered under the terms of the ITA permit and alleviate the need to have individual <br />permits for each and every one of the very small entitlement holders, I will be asking <br />approval of the Board, on behalf of California's PPR and other small entitlement holders, <br />as well as potential contractors pursuant to the Lower Colorado Water Supply Project, to <br />be a signatory to the HCP Permit Application with the intent of receiving IT A through <br />the LCR MSCP, <br /> <br />Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program <br /> <br />The Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program Technical Work Group <br />(TWG) met in Phoenix, Arizona on March 30-31,2004, The purpose of the meeting was <br />to review the proposed elements of the adaptive management program for Fiscal Years <br />2004 and 2005, and preparation of strategic plans related to core monitoring and the long- <br />term experimental plan, Additionally, Reclamation provided an overview of its proposed <br />maintenance schedule for the Glen Canyon Dam facility, Several of the turbines are <br />scheduled for rewinds and turbine runner replacements, Also, several of the fixed wheel <br />gates are scheduled to be replaced and the penstocks to be recoated, Consequently, there <br />will be periods of time during the next four years where the facility may not be able to <br />release required volumes of water at certain times of year for adaptive management <br />purposes, The purpose of this briefing was to reinforce the necessity that there needs to <br />be close coordination between the adaptive management program and Reclamation <br />regarding future experimental flow design and timing of the releases, <br /> <br />Grand Canyon Trust vs. Gale A. Norton, et al. <br /> <br />On March 31, 2004, the Grand Canyon Trust and Eartbjustice filed a lawsuit in <br />United States District Court for the District of Arizona challenging the 2002 Recovery <br />Goals for the Humpback chub alleging that they violate the federal Endangered Species <br />Act (ESA) and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), The plaintiffs allege the <br /> <br />5 <br />