|
<br />Table of Contents
<br />
<br />Paee No.
<br />
<br />FIGURE4-21 CORRELATION OF ANNUAL VOLUMES (1943-1969) BETWEEN DUCHESNE RIYER
<br />NEAR RANDLETTYS. CURRANT CREEK NEAR FRUITLAND ................,...........,.......",.,................. 4-32
<br />FlGURE4-22 CORRELATION OF ANNUAL VOLUMES (1943-1969) BETWEEN DUCHESNE RIVER
<br />NEAR RANDLETTYS. NORTH FORK OF DRY FORK .......................,.........................,..,...",........... 4-33
<br />FIGURE4-23 CORRELATION OF ANNUAL VOLUMES (1943-1969) BETWEEN DUCHESNE RIVER
<br />NEAR RANDLETT YS. DUCHESNE RIVER NEAR TABIONA........................,........,............,...,.......... 4-34
<br />FIGURE4-24 DUCHESNE RIVER NEAR RANDLETI PROJECT EFFECTS ON AVERAGE ANNUAL VOLUME
<br />ADlliSTED FOR HYDROLOGIC EFFECTS (1930-1994 ).....................................,.........,.....,.............. 4-35
<br />FIGURE 5,1 USBR ANNUAL FLow OF DUCHESNE RIVER ATRANDLETT.............,............................................, 5-5
<br />FIGURE5-2 USBR MONTIlLY AVERAGES (1906-1990).......................................................,............................5-6
<br />FlGURE5-3 USBR MONTIlLYExCEEDANCES oF25, 50, AND 75 PERCENT (1906-1990).......,...........,...........,. 5-7
<br />FIGURE5,4 COMPARISON OF AVERAGES BETWEEN USBR FLows AND ACTUAL FLows AT RANDLrrr ...,......, 5-8
<br />FIGURE5-5 AVERAGE FLOW DIFFERENCE (USBR-RANDLETI) (1912-1990) ......,.....,..........,............,.,............ 5-9
<br />FIGURE 5-6 AVERAGE FLow DIFFERENCE (USBR-RANDLETI) (1912-1970) ...............................,..."............ 5-10
<br />. FIGURE 5,7 AVERAGE FLow DIFFERENCE (USBR-RANDLETI) (1970-1990) ................................................. 5-11
<br />FlGURE5-8 YEARLY AVERAGE FLow DIFFERENCE (USBR-RANDLETI) (1912-1990) ..............,.........,.......... 5-12
<br />FIGURE 6-1 HISTORIC DIVERSIONS (1970-1994) .,.....................................................................,........"....,...,..,. 6-6
<br />FIGURE 8-1 USFWS RECOMMENDED MONTHLY FLow (AC-Ff)..........................,.......,........,.",.,...."............, 8-4
<br />FIGURE 8-2 USFWS RECOMMENDED MONTHLY FLOWS (CFS) ..,....,.............,...,......,........,..,......,..,...,....,....... 8-5
<br />FIGURE 9-1 COMPARISON OF FLOW TO USFWS FLow REQUIREMENTS .......,..,...............................,.....,.,........ 9-5
<br />FlGURE9-2 FLow DIFFERENCES (RANDLETT-USFWS 1912-1994) - DRY yEAR........................"..,................ 9-6
<br />FIGURE 9-3 FLow DIFFERENCES (RANDLETT-USFWSI912-1994) - AVERAGE YEARS ..,......,....."..,..............' 9-7
<br />FIGURE 9-4 FLOW DIFFERENCES (RANDLETT-USFWS 1912-1994) - WET yEAR.....................,......,..,.......,..... 9-8
<br />FIGURE 9-5 COMPARISON OF USFWS FLow REQUIREMENTS FOR A DRY YEAR WITH
<br />HISTORICAL HYDROGRAPHS .,..,.........................,..,...........,......................................,...,.............". 9-9
<br />FIGURE 9-6 COMPARISON OFUSFWS FLow REQUIREMENTS FOR A AVERAGE YEAR WITH
<br />HISTORICAL HYDROGRAPHS ....,.."....,.............,..,...............,............,..'....,.........,....,........,..,...."..9-10
<br />FIGURE 9-7 MONTHLY FLow DEFICIENCIES/SURPLUSES FOR RANDLETIWlTH USFWS
<br />
<br />RECOMMENDED FLOWS ........,............"...........,.........................................,",........,.,..,.........,..",.9-11
<br />
<br />SLC\134107\REPT1,DOC
<br />
<br />iv
<br />
|