My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02234
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:35:29 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:59:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.12.F
Description
UCRBRIP Management Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/15/1996
Author
CH2MHILL
Title
Draft - Duchesne River Hydrology and Water Availability Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER 4 <br /> <br />Flow Analysis of Duchesne River <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />The purpose of the flow analysis was to determine historical flows on the Duchesne River <br />for the period of USGS flow record and to extend that record to earlier years, if possible. <br />The actual USGS flow records at the Randlett gauge exist from 1943 to 1994. Flow statistics <br />developed for this period of record include average flows, percent exceedance flows, <br />recurrence intervals, and extreme flows. . <br /> <br />An examination of impacts with changing upstream operation was done by dividing the <br />record into two periods (pre-1970, post-1970) to develop statistics for each period, The pre- <br />project period was assumed to represent historical flow regime and the post-project period <br />was assumed to reflect current flow regime with increased diversions from such projects as <br />CUP and Provo River Project. There is no defined date when the flow regime changed from <br />historical flow regime because the change was incremental. Major changes occurred with <br />the CUP project coming online in 1970. Thus, the pre-project and post-project periods are <br />assumed to be pre-1970 and post-1970, respectively. To assist in determining pre-project <br />flows and the effects of longer term records, the My ton gauge was used to extend the flow <br />record of the Randlett gauge to earlier periods with less development. An analysis of flows <br />was also performed to differentiate the impacts of projects from the hydrologic effects in the <br />post-project period. Gauges not significantly impacted by development were used to <br />accomplish this task. <br /> <br />The information is summarized in the tables and figures at the end of the chapter. The <br />information can be used to make statistical inferences and draw conclusions to the historical <br />flows. <br /> <br />Flow Statistics at Randlett for 1943 through 1994 <br /> <br />Average monthly flows for the Randlett gauge are shown in Tables 4-1 and 4-2 in both CFS <br />and acre-feet, respectively. Flows statistics for the various periods are summarized in the <br />table below. <br /> <br /> <br />Period Oct Nov Dee Aug Sep Yearly Total <br /> AC-FT <br />1943-1994 299 382 410 401 443 492 419 1,022 1,881 468 206 191 398,578 <br />1943-1969 254 389 449 442 485 517 511 1,301 2,127 482 213 172 442,068 <br />.1970-1994 347 374 368 356 397 465 320 722 1,615 453 198 224 ':tC:1 c:.n7 <br />......,.,vv. <br /> <br />The average flow is a useful measure of the central value of flows. The post-project average <br />flow was determined to be approximately 20 percent less than the pre-project flows. The <br />post-project average monthly flows were less than the pre-project flows in all months <br /> <br />SlC\ 1341 07\REPT1.DOC <br /> <br />4-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.