My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02222
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02222
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:35:23 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:59:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.175
Description
Wild and Scenic-Dolores River
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
10/7/1975
Author
Bureau Outdoor Rec
Title
Dolores Study-Wild and Scenic-Corresp Reports tech etc 1968-81-Dolores Wild and Scenic River Study Fact Sheet
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />:" <br /> <br />13. INELIGIBLE SEGMENTS. Conservationists in particular have questioned <br />the conclusions of the Study Team regarding the main stem of the <br />Dolores from its source downstream to Rico, and from the confluence <br />with the San Miguel River to Gateway. Why were these segments <br />ruled out? <br /> <br />.;., <br /> <br />Upper Main Stem: This IS-mile segment was judged ineligible for <br />inclusion in the National System because it lacked any "outstandingly <br />remarkable" qualities as specified in the Wild and Scenic Rivers <br />Act. It is, accurately, a typical high mountain stream - no more, <br />no less. Nine miles of this stretch are paralleled by a paved <br />state highway. <br /> <br />Main Stem from San Miguel Confluence to Gateway: This 3D-mile <br />segment was judged ineligible for several reasons. First and <br />foremost, it is a heavily developed stretch of the river; a paved <br />state highway follows it for 26 miles; mining activity, both past <br />and present, is frequently visible; farming and ranching along <br />the river are widespread. In addition, the segment lacks outstanding <br />features, except perhaps geologic. Recreational attributes and <br />use are low, and scenic resources moderate at best. The Study Team <br />did recognize exceptional values in the 4-mi1e stretch immediately <br />below the confluence where the canyon is deep and dramatic and <br />the old Hanging Flume is of unique historic interest; howev~r, <br />this portion is simply too short for inclusion in the national <br />system by itself. <br /> <br />14. MANAGEMENT PLAN A number of individuals wondered how the Management <br />Plan for those segments of the Dolores included in the National <br />System will be developed. And when? <br /> <br />The Study Team is empowered to develop a conceptual plan only for <br />those segments it recommends for inclusion in the national system. <br />By "conceptual," we mean it will be like a preliminary blueprint - <br />a jumping-off point for the preparation of a final, working manage- <br />ment plan. <br /> <br />\\ <br /> <br />The latter plan will be developed only if Congress approves one <br />or more segments of the Dolores for inclusion in the national <br />system. In that case, the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land <br />Management and the State of Colorado will have a year to prepare <br />a detailed, concrete plan. This will allow adequate timo for <br />specific input from concerned and affected persons. <br /> <br />.I <br /> <br />15. ADDITIONAL INPUT. Almost everyone who wrote the Study Team wanted <br />(implicitly or outright) to know when and how they'd have a chance <br />to add more comment on the Dolores, the present study, and future <br />actions. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />0755 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.