My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02185
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:35:02 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:57:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.100.70
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/1/1991
Title
The Brownell Task Force and the Mexican Salinity Problem - A Narrative Chronology of Events
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />",' <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />j) <br /> <br />C <br />\I.)" <br />. .,..... <br />w <br /> <br />The Brownell Task Force and the Mexican Salinity Problem: <br />A Narrative Chronology of Events <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Seventeen years ago this summer, in June 1974, President Nixon signed into law P.L. 93,.320, <br />the Colo$do River Basin Salinity Control Act. Title I of the Act authorized the Federal <br />Governm~et to take measures to eliminate the effects of brackish return flows (or drainja.ge) from <br />the Welltbn-Mohawk irrigation project on water delivered to Mexico under a 1944 treaty <br />allocating!thewaters of the Rio Grande, Tijuana, and Colorado Rivers between the U.S. andlts <br />southern n,eighbor. At the heart of the Title I program was a 100 million gaUon-per-qay (mgd). <br />desalting plant to be built at a site near Yuma, Arizona. The desalting plant was to be the <br />solution tq a water quality dispute that had periodically troubled U.S.-Mexican relations since <br />1961. <br /> <br />" ~ <br /> <br />The Yumll Desalting Plant was to remove 90 percent of the dissolved salts from the return <br />flows, by ~ process called reverse osmosis. This desalted water was then to be blended with the <br />remaining idrainage to yield water of the quality guaranteed Mexico under a 1973 Minute to the <br />original tr\laty, Minute No. 242. The estimated capital cost of the plant, along with other <br />measures Called for in Title I, was estimated at slightly under $100 million at the time of <br />authorization. <br /> <br />'~ <br />~ <br /> <br />:}, <br />,~ <br />,"II <br /> <br />t <br />~1. <br />'r <br />, <br /> <br />CompletiOn of the plant is now thirteen years behind the original schedule. Its capital, cost hils <br />risen to mprethan $400 million, and projected yearly operation and maintenance costs range <br />from $10 million to $33.million. The blended waters to be delivered to Mexico may cost. as <br />much as $$00 per acre-foot to produce. I <br /> <br />Why did tjle Federal government choose such a costly-and risky-means to implement an <br />intemation~ Ilgreement? To answer that question, We must look at the history of that <br />decision-the people involved, their perspectives and limitations, the courses of action they <br />believed were available, and the constraints under which they worked. But first, whafwas. the <br />problem th~y were solving-or thought they were solving? <br /> <br />^_:L j <br /> <br />,;!: <br /> <br /> <br />Emergence of the Salinity Issue <br /> <br />The treaty tjlatguaranteed Mexico 1.5 million acre-feet of Colorado River water annually "froIIl <br />any and alllsources" did not specify its salinity. The salinity of water used for irrigation water <br />is often critical to agricultural productivity, as high concentrations of salt reduce crop yields and <br />may preclude the growing of salt-sensitive crops such as tomatoes and lettuce. Because Mexico <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.