My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02161
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02161
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:56 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:56:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.600.60
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Basin Member State Info - Utah
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1968
Title
Utah Desalting Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I-" <br />00 <br />~ <br />01 <br /> <br />The dominant present and projected water uses in the Bear River portion <br />of the Wasatch Front are irrigation and marshland evapotranspiration. Nearly <br />all of the present irrigation diversions in Box Elder County are met from the <br />Bear River itself at diversion points located at Cutler Dam. The Ma1ad River <br />(a tributary of the Bear River) has a total dissolved solids content excess- <br />ively high for irrigation, and is used only for marshland supply. The managed <br />marshlands are also supplied by the Bear River, natural springs, and return <br />flows from irrigated lands. The diversion points are located mainly below <br />irrigated lands and directly above the outflows to the Great Salt Lake. All <br />,culinary water for municipalities and rural domestic systems is obtained from, <br />springs, wells, and the small mountain streams. The entire population of <br />Box Elder County is 28,000. The population forecast for the year 2000 is <br />56,000. <br /> <br />Water uses in Weber and Davis Counties (Weber and Ogden River drain- <br />ages) are similar to those in Box Elder County, with the addition of a <br />substantial municipal and industrial demand. Irrigation and M&I needs are <br />met primarily by surface flows from the Weber and Ogden Rivers and local <br />mountain streams. About 36,000 acre-feet annually are presently produced <br />from wells. These supply part of the municipal and domestic demand. The <br />present supply to marshlands consists of about 57 percent return flows <br />from irrigation and 43 percent previously undiverted flows from the Weber <br />River. Approximately 206,000 people live in the two counties. This popu- <br />lation is expected to rise to 472,000 by the year 2000. <br /> <br />The Jordan River and tributaries directly serve the largest popula- <br />tion center in the State of Utah. The present population estimate for <br />Salt Lake County is 443,000 and for Utah County is 120,000. The projected <br />population for the year 2000 for the two counties is 976,000 and 243,000, <br />respectively. Agriculture is still a major water user in the Jordan River <br />Basin, and it will not be until nearly the year 2000 that water consumption <br />by M&I uses is projected to exceed water consumption by agricultural uses. <br />In general, M&I uses are supplied by local mountain streams, the Provo River, <br />Weber River, the Duchesne River and, to a lesser extent, by groundwater. <br />Present irrigation water is obtained principally from Utah Lake, the Jordan, <br />Spanish Fork, Weber and Duchesne River, and local mountain stream, and ground- <br />water. Marshland water use also is important in this basin. It is presently <br />met by return flows from agriculture, sewage effluent, and other presently <br />uncontrolled flows of the Jordan River. <br /> <br />Water Sources <br /> <br />Most present and near-future water problems in Utah appear to be <br />related to distribution in time and space. In general, the north central <br />part of the state has a more-than-sufficient supply to satisfy present <br />uses (although there are summer shortages), while in much of the remainder <br />of the state the supply even in years of average runoff has been inadequate <br />to meet existing or desired uses. It is apparent that if the state as a <br />whole is to have adequate water to meet projected uses, it must depend on <br /> <br />-25- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.